1.1 sec in total
154 ms
767 ms
204 ms
Visit webtoolkit.info now to see the best up-to-date Webtoolkit content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webtoolkit.info
a simple way to share code snippets and pastes with others.
Visit webtoolkit.infoWe analyzed Webtoolkit.info page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 971 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
webtoolkit.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value11.6 s
5/100
10%
Value15,520 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
154 ms
45 ms
72 ms
73 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webtoolkit.info, 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) belongs to the original domain Webtoolkit.info.
Page size can be reduced by 378.7 kB (51%)
738.3 kB
359.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Webtoolkit.info main page is 738.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 393.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webtoolkit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 224.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.7 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtoolkit.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (76%)
37
9
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtoolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webtoolkit.info
154 ms
crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.css
45 ms
arduino_ide_copy_ver_2.6.5.css
72 ms
monaco_ver_2.6.5.css
73 ms
styles_ver_1.4.4.css
73 ms
jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.css
76 ms
default_ver_1.4.4.css
86 ms
css
25 ms
genericons_ver_2.09.css
87 ms
style_ver_2013_07_18.css
139 ms
jquery_ver_1.11.0.js
170 ms
jquery_migrate.min_ver_1.2.1.js
108 ms
crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.js
106 ms
iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js
123 ms
swfupload_ver_2201_20110113.js
125 ms
swfobject_ver_2.2_20120417.js
143 ms
swfupload.swfobject_ver_2201a.js
143 ms
swfupload.queue_ver_2201.js
165 ms
module.admin.page.icons.min.css
189 ms
jquery.min.js
187 ms
modernizr.js
199 ms
harabara.cufonfonts.js
187 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
jquery.iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js
216 ms
jquery.form.min_ver_3.37.0.js
215 ms
jquery.smooth_scroll.min_ver_1.4.9.js
227 ms
jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.js
252 ms
jquery.uniform.min_ver_2.1.0.js
226 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min_ver_0.1.js
225 ms
masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js
243 ms
jquery.masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js
259 ms
functions_ver_2013_07_18.js
261 ms
cufon-yui.js
8 ms
noise.png
183 ms
box-head1.png
125 ms
ulbg_content.jpg
124 ms
footerbg.jpg
136 ms
ca-pub-0558396375697376.js
58 ms
zrt_lookup.html
43 ms
show_ads_impl.js
65 ms
ads
193 ms
osd.js
11 ms
ads
197 ms
m_js_controller.js
43 ms
abg.js
56 ms
favicon
43 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
43 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
28 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
12 ms
webtoolkit.info accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
webtoolkit.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webtoolkit.info SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtoolkit.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webtoolkit.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webtoolkit.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: