Tools & Wizards About Us
webversusweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

webversusweb.com

The domain name WebVersusWeb.com is for sale

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

webversusweb.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Versus content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webversusweb.com

The domain name WebVersusWeb.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit webversusweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webversusweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webversusweb.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webversusweb.com

59 ms

webversusweb.com

294 ms

normalize.css

15 ms

foundation.css

37 ms

style.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webversusweb.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

616.8 kB

After Optimization

493.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webversusweb.com main page is 616.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 346.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 39.7 kB
  • After minification 34.5 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 346.7 kB
  • After minification 302.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Versus needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 49.4 kB

  • Original 230.4 kB
  • After minification 230.3 kB
  • After compression 181.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Versus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webversusweb.com

webversusweb.com

59 ms

webversusweb.com

webversusweb.com

294 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

15 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

44 ms

ie8-grid-foundation-4.css

ie8-grid-foundation-4.css

35 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

139 ms

custom.modernizr.js

custom.modernizr.js

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

7 ms

general.js

general.js

42 ms

tooltip.css

tooltip.css

42 ms

tooltip.js

tooltip.js

47 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

231 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

49 ms

bg_body.png

bg_body.png

132 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

206 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

110 ms

cloud_back.png

cloud_back.png

122 ms

cloud_front.png

cloud_front.png

122 ms

bg_top.gif

bg_top.gif

122 ms

bg_zone1.png

bg_zone1.png

120 ms

longbranch.png

longbranch.png

122 ms

branch.png

branch.png

143 ms

bg_zone1_2.png

bg_zone1_2.png

144 ms

compara_button.png

compara_button.png

143 ms

bg_zone2.png

bg_zone2.png

142 ms

ajax-white.png

ajax-white.png

143 ms

bg_zone3.gif

bg_zone3.gif

143 ms

bg_dossier.png

bg_dossier.png

180 ms

bg_section.png

bg_section.png

178 ms

twitter_button.png

twitter_button.png

180 ms

sello.png

sello.png

184 ms

owl_button.png

owl_button.png

182 ms

alexa.png

alexa.png

178 ms

seomoz.png

seomoz.png

180 ms

google-speed.png

google-speed.png

181 ms

wokometrics.png

wokometrics.png

181 ms

bg_footer.png

bg_footer.png

182 ms

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf

88 ms

Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lw.ttf

Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lw.ttf

44 ms

like.php

like.php

379 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

39 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

77 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

72 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

39 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

62 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

680 ms

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

24 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

12 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

16 ms

settings

settings

72 ms

SxMMxgluxMw.js

SxMMxgluxMw.js

30 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

16 ms

SxMMxgluxMw.js

SxMMxgluxMw.js

20 ms

closeBtn.gif

closeBtn.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

webversusweb.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

webversusweb.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webversusweb.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webversusweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webversusweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webversusweb.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Versus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: