6.4 sec in total
896 ms
5 sec
460 ms
Welcome to weclaim.ru homepage info - get ready to check Weclaim best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about weclaim.ru
Повышение качества обслуживания – залог успешного бизнеса. Современная книга жалоб WeClaim позволяет потребителям без труда подать жалобу, а руководителям – оперативно ответить на обращение
Visit weclaim.ruWe analyzed Weclaim.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 896 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
weclaim.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value21.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.088
93/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
896 ms
625 ms
301 ms
1357 ms
320 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Weclaim.ru, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Weclaim.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (46%)
2.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Weclaim.ru main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weclaim images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weclaim.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (47%)
45
24
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weclaim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weclaim.ru
896 ms
bootstrap.css
625 ms
nc-styles.css
301 ms
style.css
1357 ms
customize.css
320 ms
modal-video.min.css
321 ms
odometer-theme-car.css
320 ms
css
23 ms
logo-light-135x34.png
452 ms
logo-188x48.png
472 ms
100x100-59ca20611fe7a.jpg
497 ms
100x100-59c436026725c.jpg
504 ms
100x100-59ca1d389c273.jpg
604 ms
100x100-59c43643e30e3.jpg
627 ms
100x100-59ca1eb952734.jpg
668 ms
100x100-59c964b012320.jpg
668 ms
100x100-59c96229d2f6b.jpg
754 ms
100x100-59c9636edb5e9.jpg
770 ms
jquery.js
1561 ms
yii.js
821 ms
yii.validation.js
821 ms
yii.activeForm.js
1050 ms
nc-form.js
921 ms
nc-common.js
974 ms
core.min.js
1664 ms
modal-video.min.js
1074 ms
odometer.min.js
1127 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
1209 ms
jquery.mask.min.js
1226 ms
script.js
1557 ms
common.js
1556 ms
322x219-5a184524700fa.jpg
1556 ms
322x219-59c4e3623f51b.jpg
1557 ms
322x219-59c43ded0f52c.jpg
1557 ms
css
18 ms
tag.js
1570 ms
owl-nav-modern-white.png
179 ms
icon-quote.png
179 ms
home-4-946x689.jpg
1032 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
16 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
16 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
17 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
17 ms
iconfont.ttf
898 ms
MaterialIcons-Regular.woff
898 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
898 ms
install.js
912 ms
pointer-events.min.js
754 ms
1920x837-59944680d47ab.jpg
705 ms
1920x837-599446a2dbbdb.jpg
419 ms
1920x837-599446af1fd5c.jpg
839 ms
ajax-loader.gif
250 ms
owl-nav-modern.png
362 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrH.woff
99 ms
fl-bigmug-line.woff
220 ms
advert.gif
572 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
160 ms
weclaim.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
weclaim.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
weclaim.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weclaim.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weclaim.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weclaim.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weclaim. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: