2.9 sec in total
305 ms
1.5 sec
1 sec
Visit weddinggawker.com now to see the best up-to-date Weddinggawker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weddinggawker.com
Visually browse, discover and share wedding ideas and inspiration. See your wedding day!
Visit weddinggawker.comWe analyzed Weddinggawker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
weddinggawker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value2,490 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
305 ms
203 ms
189 ms
249 ms
226 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Weddinggawker.com, 30% (22 requests) were made to Photo2.weddinggawker.com and 30% (22 requests) were made to Photo.weddinggawker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (650 ms) relates to the external source Photo2.weddinggawker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 858.6 kB (23%)
3.8 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Weddinggawker.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 206.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weddinggawker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 470.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weddinggawker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (17%)
71
59
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weddinggawker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
weddinggawker.com
305 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
203 ms
33c21d97ab7921c52765b32448dd3321.f93632e4ce89ac7d0442ae4a4ba4547d.css
189 ms
448e785a212d14b77fd8a4dff069e9ab.525bac3fdef9c933f7e99aac93932303.js
249 ms
gpt.js
226 ms
gpt_mobile.js
228 ms
ga.js
372 ms
header-repeat_6-7-13.jpg
226 ms
226929.jpg
640 ms
226933.jpg
643 ms
retina-icons.png
386 ms
wg-logo_6-7-13.png
343 ms
sprite-a.20140610.png
344 ms
card-hover-top.png
384 ms
card-hover-btm.png
384 ms
226957.jpg
596 ms
226969.jpg
524 ms
226931.jpg
622 ms
226973.jpeg
634 ms
226967.jpg
634 ms
226939.jpg
633 ms
226953.jpg
650 ms
226945.jpg
638 ms
226947.jpg
636 ms
226965.jpg
634 ms
226927.jpg
623 ms
226951.jpg
544 ms
226943.jpeg
634 ms
226971.jpg
632 ms
226925.jpg
632 ms
226941.jpg
649 ms
226935.jpg
633 ms
226955.jpg
635 ms
226937.jpg
648 ms
226949.jpg
637 ms
footer-texture.jpg
297 ms
addthis-blank.gif
297 ms
Lato-Regular-webfont.woff
286 ms
Lato-Bold-webfont.woff
316 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
188 ms
footer-bar-texture.jpg
304 ms
quant.js
163 ms
loading-bar.gif
193 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
__utm.gif
121 ms
pixel;r=1500906476;a=p-ac23cN1QUP2Is;fpan=1;fpa=P0-616031299-1456765221183;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456765221182;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fweddinggawker.com%2F;ogl=site_name.weddinggawker%2Ctitle.weddinggawker%2Ctype.blog%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fweddinggawker%252Ecom%2Cdescription.see%20the%20day
136 ms
container.html
172 ms
83 ms
226921.jpg
93 ms
226899.jpg
65 ms
226863.jpg
51 ms
226905.jpg
84 ms
226917.jpg
61 ms
226867.jpg
85 ms
226909.jpg
117 ms
226861.jpg
114 ms
226915.jpg
145 ms
226855.jpg
140 ms
226903.jpg
137 ms
226895.jpg
66 ms
226859.jpg
54 ms
226919.jpg
58 ms
226857.jpg
80 ms
226885.jpg
83 ms
226881.jpg
90 ms
226897.jpg
110 ms
226865.jpg
93 ms
226873.jpg
98 ms
226893.jpg
134 ms
226883.jpg
131 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
pixel;r=106879358;a=p-ac23cN1QUP2Is;fpan=0;fpa=P0-616031299-1456765221183;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456765221416;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fweddinggawker.com%2F;ogl=site_name.weddinggawker%2Ctitle.weddinggawker%2Ctype.blog%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fweddinggawker%252Ecom%2Cdescription.see%20the%20day
36 ms
fg_popular_count.php
32 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
weddinggawker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
weddinggawker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
weddinggawker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weddinggawker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weddinggawker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weddinggawker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weddinggawker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: