5 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.1 sec
635 ms
Welcome to wedfish.in homepage info - get ready to check Wedfish best content right away, or after learning these important things about wedfish.in
Wedding Planner
Visit wedfish.inWe analyzed Wedfish.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wedfish.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value1.578
0/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
1223 ms
81 ms
41 ms
52 ms
209 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Wedfish.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wedfish.in.
Page size can be reduced by 642.9 kB (13%)
5.1 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Wedfish.in main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 537.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wedfish needs image optimization as it can save up to 537.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wedfish.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (57%)
75
32
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wedfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wedfish.in
1223 ms
js
81 ms
css
41 ms
css
52 ms
mainstyles.css
209 ms
styles.css
215 ms
dashicons.min.css
270 ms
bootstrap.min.css
264 ms
animate.css
211 ms
owl.carousel.css
213 ms
font-awesome.min.css
259 ms
nivo-slider.css
302 ms
preview.css
300 ms
style.css
299 ms
style.css
346 ms
responsive.css
354 ms
menu_main.css
357 ms
jquery.js
472 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
387 ms
modernizr-2.8.3.min.js
388 ms
webfont.js
51 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
357 ms
app.js
341 ms
scripts.js
341 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
455 ms
masonry.min.js
455 ms
bootstrap.min.js
457 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
458 ms
wow.min.js
459 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
489 ms
home.js
490 ms
jquery.gallery.js
504 ms
plugins.js
512 ms
main.js
515 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
544 ms
menu.js
547 ms
wp-embed.min.js
547 ms
js
55 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
57 ms
logo-wedfish-decor.png
313 ms
Slide-16_9-4.jpg
619 ms
Slide-16_9-5.jpg
451 ms
Slide-16_9-3.jpg
621 ms
Slide-16_9-6.jpg
822 ms
Slide-16_9-9.jpg
990 ms
section-line.png
400 ms
service2.fw_.png
490 ms
service1.png
539 ms
service3.png
576 ms
12345-2.jpg
797 ms
left.png
664 ms
right.png
705 ms
service-bg.jpg
708 ms
stage-decoration.png
752 ms
party.fw_.png
804 ms
5.fw_.png
799 ms
video..fw_.png
839 ms
3B85BF.fw_.png
884 ms
jnoijk.fw_.png
887 ms
hjjkkl.fw_.png
891 ms
about-min1.png
1503 ms
css
45 ms
wkfd.jpg
973 ms
browser.png
931 ms
Filler-and-Props-wedfish.jpg
933 ms
PachaPandhal-wedfish.jpg
936 ms
StageDecoration-wedfish.jpg
1016 ms
bg-1.png
1184 ms
bg.jpg
978 ms
wedfish-footer-logo.png
984 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1012 ms
font
105 ms
font
112 ms
font
142 ms
enotype.ttf
1049 ms
2022997930.png
1031 ms
whatsapp-icon-square.svg
1032 ms
slide-border.png
1056 ms
gallery-spae-two.png
1150 ms
gallery-spae-one.png
1092 ms
wedfish.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wedfish.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
wedfish.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wedfish.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wedfish.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wedfish.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wedfish. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: