Tools & Wizards About Us
wedgewood-inc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

wedgewood-inc.com

Welcome to Wedgewood | Wedgewood

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

wedgewood-inc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wedgewood-inc.com homepage info - get ready to check Wedgewood Inc best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wedgewood-inc.com

Visit wedgewood-inc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wedgewood-inc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wedgewood-inc.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wedgewood-inc.com

53 ms

wedgewood-inc.com

128 ms

widget.js

176 ms

ajax-progress.module.css

32 ms

align.module.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Wedgewood-inc.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (5%)

Content Size

37.3 MB

After Optimization

35.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wedgewood-inc.com main page is 37.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 325.8 kB

  • Original 421.1 kB
  • After minification 409.0 kB
  • After compression 95.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 325.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 36.1 MB
  • After minification 35.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wedgewood Inc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 462.3 kB

  • Original 708.7 kB
  • After minification 708.7 kB
  • After compression 246.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 462.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 79.0 kB
  • After compression 53.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wedgewood-inc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (60%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wedgewood Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wedgewood-inc.com

wedgewood-inc.com

53 ms

wedgewood-inc.com

wedgewood-inc.com

128 ms

widget.js

widget.js

176 ms

ajax-progress.module.css

ajax-progress.module.css

32 ms

align.module.css

align.module.css

32 ms

autocomplete-loading.module.css

autocomplete-loading.module.css

31 ms

fieldgroup.module.css

fieldgroup.module.css

31 ms

container-inline.module.css

container-inline.module.css

31 ms

clearfix.module.css

clearfix.module.css

55 ms

details.module.css

details.module.css

61 ms

hidden.module.css

hidden.module.css

60 ms

item-list.module.css

item-list.module.css

54 ms

js.module.css

js.module.css

61 ms

nowrap.module.css

nowrap.module.css

59 ms

position-container.module.css

position-container.module.css

65 ms

progress.module.css

progress.module.css

67 ms

reset-appearance.module.css

reset-appearance.module.css

70 ms

resize.module.css

resize.module.css

68 ms

sticky-header.module.css

sticky-header.module.css

71 ms

system-status-counter.css

system-status-counter.css

73 ms

system-status-report-counters.css

system-status-report-counters.css

72 ms

system-status-report-general-info.css

system-status-report-general-info.css

78 ms

tabledrag.module.css

tabledrag.module.css

74 ms

tablesort.module.css

tablesort.module.css

81 ms

tree-child.module.css

tree-child.module.css

75 ms

views.module.css

views.module.css

78 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

82 ms

motion-ui.min.css

motion-ui.min.css

82 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

82 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

85 ms

splitting.css

splitting.css

103 ms

style.css

style.css

90 ms

frontend_css.css

frontend_css.css

88 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

89 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

59 ms

css2

css2

78 ms

imj1bgd.css

imj1bgd.css

66 ms

jquery-3.6.1.js

jquery-3.6.1.js

57 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

75 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

what-input.min.js

what-input.min.js

60 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

71 ms

motion-ui.min.js

motion-ui.min.js

69 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

69 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

67 ms

splitting.min.js

splitting.min.js

70 ms

main.js

main.js

75 ms

matter.min.js

matter.min.js

77 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

35 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

37 ms

js

js

85 ms

p.css

p.css

26 ms

Ad%20Crop%20-%20South%20Bay%27s%20Favorite%202024_0.png

Ad%20Crop%20-%20South%20Bay%27s%20Favorite%202024_0.png

81 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

62 ms

E%2014th%20St_TX_After_sm.jpg

E%2014th%20St_TX_After_sm.jpg

83 ms

E%2014th%20St_TX_Before.jpg

E%2014th%20St_TX_Before.jpg

69 ms

who-we-are.jpg

who-we-are.jpg

224 ms

what-were-about_1.jpg

what-were-about_1.jpg

74 ms

Commercial-Annex-after-new.jpg

Commercial-Annex-after-new.jpg

71 ms

Annex-before.jpg

Annex-before.jpg

214 ms

national-footprint-2.jpg

national-footprint-2.jpg

216 ms

proprietary-analytics.jpg

proprietary-analytics.jpg

227 ms

value-driven-design.jpg

value-driven-design.jpg

218 ms

sustainable-approach.jpg

sustainable-approach.jpg

230 ms

1205%20S%20Amantha%20Ave_After_green.jpg

1205%20S%20Amantha%20Ave_After_green.jpg

233 ms

1205%20S%20Amantha%20Ave_Before_0.jpg

1205%20S%20Amantha%20Ave_Before_0.jpg

239 ms

1412%20Via%20Gabriel_CA_After_sm.jpg

1412%20Via%20Gabriel_CA_After_sm.jpg

238 ms

1412%20Via%20Gabriel_CA_Before_sm.jpg

1412%20Via%20Gabriel_CA_Before_sm.jpg

242 ms

1215%20Ursuline_TX_After_new_3.jpg

1215%20Ursuline_TX_After_new_3.jpg

244 ms

1215%20Ursuline_TX_Before_new_0.jpg

1215%20Ursuline_TX_Before_new_0.jpg

248 ms

2651%20Little%20Kate%20Road_UT_After_1.jpg

2651%20Little%20Kate%20Road_UT_After_1.jpg

251 ms

2651%20Little%20Kate%20Road_UT_Before_0.jpg

2651%20Little%20Kate%20Road_UT_Before_0.jpg

256 ms

3536%20West%20Blvd_CA_After_sm.jpg

3536%20West%20Blvd_CA_After_sm.jpg

259 ms

3536%20West%20Blvd_CA_Before_sm.jpg

3536%20West%20Blvd_CA_Before_sm.jpg

253 ms

our-team-new_0.jpg

our-team-new_0.jpg

262 ms

Featured_Blog%204.jpg

Featured_Blog%204.jpg

260 ms

RMHC%20Las%20Vegas%20-%20December%202023%20861x896.png

RMHC%20Las%20Vegas%20-%20December%202023%20861x896.png

267 ms

2023%20Dallas%20Wedgefest%20762x1015%20Modified.png

2023%20Dallas%20Wedgefest%20762x1015%20Modified.png

270 ms

Three%20Square%20-%20037%201600x1020.png

Three%20Square%20-%20037%201600x1020.png

275 ms

logo-footer.svg

logo-footer.svg

264 ms

arrow-right-white.svg

arrow-right-white.svg

226 ms

arrow-right-brown.svg

arrow-right-brown.svg

230 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1WwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1WwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

537 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

665 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaOlGrw_BTU.woff

665 ms

d

d

5 ms

minerva-modern.woff

minerva-modern.woff

533 ms

d

d

260 ms

widget_app_base_1724056634836.js

widget_app_base_1724056634836.js

290 ms

Accessibility Review

wedgewood-inc.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

wedgewood-inc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wedgewood-inc.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wedgewood-inc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wedgewood-inc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wedgewood-inc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wedgewood Inc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: