5.6 sec in total
907 ms
3.2 sec
1.5 sec
Visit weekdayphotos.com now to see the best up-to-date Weekdayphotos content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weekdayphotos.com
DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.
Visit weekdayphotos.comWe analyzed Weekdayphotos.com page load time and found that the first response time was 907 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
weekdayphotos.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
907 ms
88 ms
181 ms
36 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Weekdayphotos.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Weekdayphotos.com.
Page size can be reduced by 824.2 kB (13%)
6.3 MB
5.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Weekdayphotos.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weekdayphotos images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 324.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 289.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weekdayphotos.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 289.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (58%)
85
36
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weekdayphotos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.weekdayphotos.com
907 ms
style.css
88 ms
colorpicker.css
181 ms
css
36 ms
css
83 ms
styles.css
162 ms
responsive.css
196 ms
shortcodes.css
171 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
196 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
197 ms
page_templates.css
239 ms
jquery.js
330 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
267 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
263 ms
css
51 ms
platform.js
84 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
277 ms
superfish.js
277 ms
custom.js
312 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
434 ms
et_flexslider.js
434 ms
jquery.form.min.js
436 ms
scripts.js
435 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
484 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
484 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
490 ms
wp-embed.min.js
490 ms
et_shortcodes_frontend.js
489 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
308 ms
d3pl7mxPkGU
353 ms
L-Photographie-St.-Louis-Wedding-Ad-2011.jpg
1024 ms
13.jpg
1201 ms
882af16cea41a27fa7dfc51aad4797d8.jpg
351 ms
follow-on-pinterest-button.png
351 ms
69328.jpg
546 ms
9df112b1631c320e790adfa391ff5846.jpg
1059 ms
c0a77fbc6c2ca8460745bed5665a2058.jpg
371 ms
3e93cdaceb1f5c41b2819333616becf3.jpg
405 ms
Wedding-Couple-Wallpapers.jpg
669 ms
header-shadow.png
369 ms
logo.png
369 ms
twitter.png
369 ms
rss.png
369 ms
facebook.png
369 ms
search-bg.png
474 ms
search_btn.png
516 ms
featured-bg.png
474 ms
Wedding_couple-960x332.jpg
638 ms
allaire.jpg
966 ms
ashbury.jpg
980 ms
branch.jpg
1233 ms
manasquan-e1445146208752-1024x357.jpg
902 ms
mindowaskin.jpg
945 ms
trees-1024x686.jpg
818 ms
lighting.jpg
898 ms
wedd.jpg
1005 ms
kids.jpg
1023 ms
Liberty-House.jpg
1042 ms
the-grove.jpeg
1046 ms
nanina-1024x682.jpg
1143 ms
wedding-photographer-melbourne-1024x427.jpg
1086 ms
paris-surprise-proposal-02.jpg
1185 ms
San-Diego-Wedding-Photography_Family-Portrait-e1443184595369.jpg
1132 ms
shortcodes-sprite.png
1106 ms
sidebar-bullet.png
1127 ms
XreLooTt3EU7pik51LvgPw.ttf
304 ms
a1jgjBwEF1FcIjUj3bw8cfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
339 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
340 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
355 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
261 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
282 ms
person
569 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
102 ms
www-embed-player.js
129 ms
postmessageRelay
62 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
88 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
64 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
45 ms
ad_status.js
49 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
79 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
109 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
rs=AGLTcCNrqkNABaxQlOsMYJ6Ejsen-957Vg
13 ms
photo.jpg
115 ms
Vibrant-spring-wedding-ideas-13.jpg
116 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
62 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
104 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
105 ms
rs=AGLTcCOFe0ICGMfEiURrBMnTsZI9m_OXug
15 ms
rs=AGLTcCMbFZq9EzXANPBH3V1p_6p-yXCwWw
46 ms
rs=AGLTcCMbFZq9EzXANPBH3V1p_6p-yXCwWw
16 ms
rs=AGLTcCMbFZq9EzXANPBH3V1p_6p-yXCwWw
11 ms
featured-top-shadow.png
97 ms
featured-bottom-shadow.png
96 ms
featured-description.png
93 ms
readmore.png
123 ms
weekdayphotos.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
weekdayphotos.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
weekdayphotos.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weekdayphotos.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Weekdayphotos.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weekdayphotos.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weekdayphotos. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: