7 sec in total
186 ms
6 sec
849 ms
Visit weekendmaids.net now to see the best up-to-date Weekend Maid S content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weekendmaids.net
Weekend Maids Referral Agency providing 24 hours same day skilled domestic house cleaning & exceptional maid services in southern & northern California.
Visit weekendmaids.netWe analyzed Weekendmaids.net page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
weekendmaids.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.7 s
0/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value32.6 s
0/100
10%
Value94,840 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value138.9 s
0/100
10%
186 ms
410 ms
202 ms
428 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Weekendmaids.net, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Weekendmaids.net.
Page size can be reduced by 262.6 kB (12%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Weekendmaids.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 254.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weekend Maid S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weekendmaids.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 96 (80%)
120
24
The browser has sent 120 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weekend Maid S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 63 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weekendmaids.net
186 ms
weekendmaids.net
410 ms
gtm.js
202 ms
js
428 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
style.min.css
248 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
405 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
252 ms
better-recent-comments.min.css
253 ms
autoptimize_single_20e8490fab0dcf7557a5c8b54494db6f.css
244 ms
autoptimize_single_359aca8a88b2331aa34ac505acad9911.css
296 ms
dashicons.min.css
363 ms
autoptimize_single_658ed7c8d9872eb232101d85f58c8cc5.css
337 ms
autoptimize_single_73d29ecb3ae4eb2b78712fab3a46d32d.css
366 ms
css
365 ms
css
403 ms
css
403 ms
all.css
508 ms
bootstrap.min.css
403 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
361 ms
autoptimize_single_ff9da1b8cdece73a05bc09be7e42f77c.css
575 ms
autoptimize_single_08b05a87a08d4a5e6f46834aa78697c4.css
735 ms
css
400 ms
autoptimize_single_38e66aed3c4141d4e3d53dccfebcb235.css
450 ms
autoptimize_single_ec1104d90f516cca06af5c8744b915d0.css
463 ms
autoptimize_single_5eb398dc027646f01bd35f6f22683ed5.css
462 ms
js_composer.min.css
779 ms
formreset.min.css
515 ms
formsmain.min.css
516 ms
readyclass.min.css
512 ms
browsers.min.css
568 ms
autoptimize_single_91db343ce6ba3a7087b842ae51b0bac1.css
545 ms
autoptimize_single_ec6a0b120600a6c45807c38a3cb6b535.css
535 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
575 ms
jquery.min.js
913 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
577 ms
autoptimize_single_dffa195b546cf1dfd52f2206955eb892.js
588 ms
autoptimize_single_d57ea8be4223524c97a28d4bcbe46825.js
589 ms
bootstrap.min.js
503 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
691 ms
default_owl.carousel.min.js
690 ms
autoptimize_single_ccdf893e7d8b26933af0c336bcc3943e.js
588 ms
autoptimize_single_07d726da4233addca7e060904b6a902c.js
691 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
388 ms
autoptimize_single_c1e0e1305d61be4229345937bb74b8a0.js
712 ms
html2canvas.min.js
712 ms
jquery.json.min.js
713 ms
api.js
455 ms
qs.js
504 ms
font-awesome.min.css
520 ms
font-awesome-animation.min.css
494 ms
css2
388 ms
516 ms
css
371 ms
w.js
440 ms
api.js
498 ms
js
417 ms
weekendmaids.net
731 ms
autoptimize_single_c864b6bf79849e42b11638d72ac74d62.css
625 ms
js
280 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
489 ms
gravityforms.min.js
485 ms
autoptimize_single_e4bc36ab2466557778b0011bdd25ec17.js
486 ms
jquery.min.js
486 ms
autoptimize_single_ccdf893e7d8b26933af0c336bcc3943e.js
463 ms
autoptimize_single_e66f0587378a3b7b001958c397797db3.js
714 ms
autoptimize_single_75abd4cd8807b312f9f7faeb77ee774b.js
397 ms
autoptimize_single_7528d405618574126935b33521c7b857.js
397 ms
analytics.js
191 ms
autoptimize_single_b05f10be5dc47940fc74ad56a9495aaf.js
371 ms
axios.min.js
148 ms
autoptimize_single_16fb1664ddebf663a909c51d40ad7914.js
363 ms
comment-reply.min.js
301 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
301 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
299 ms
qs.js
81 ms
dom-ready.min.js
249 ms
hooks.min.js
241 ms
i18n.min.js
243 ms
axios.min.js
48 ms
a11y.min.js
199 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
197 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
337 ms
frontend.min.js
335 ms
gfsignature_delete_signature.min.js
331 ms
qs.js
139 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
459 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
321 ms
autoptimize_single_91d3419c22ca3aaf16e35a34f620b967.js
318 ms
collect
365 ms
autoptimize_single_9dbeddac00e7003b4d21efb3fb821e8f.js
217 ms
recaptcha__en.js
77 ms
gtm.js
116 ms
collect
191 ms
collect
54 ms
conversion_async.js
51 ms
collect
116 ms
hotjar-2945147.js
273 ms
fbevents.js
195 ms
267 ms
collect
246 ms
c70b8c91f2d2a051c2d0dcf62.js
253 ms
banner-1-scaled.jpg
216 ms
asked-questions.png
172 ms
form-background-image.png
173 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
123 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
273 ms
766371410160105
104 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
102 ms
154 ms
Rectangle-60-copy-2-1.png
246 ms
g.gif
761 ms
mail.png
353 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
129 ms
Gift-box.png
105 ms
call.png
329 ms
site-logo.png
115 ms
js
111 ms
m-outer-75d43c2e886cc6ccd658213a3f01bfcc.html
316 ms
m-outer-acce27bb37678bf915642b16241314a7.js
112 ms
inner.html
325 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
57 ms
526 ms
509 ms
expert.png
502 ms
18 ms
24 ms
clean-house.png
23 ms
a794be2514a34425b3b9c31d334f289543bbd63bea5c4b358bc8bd6c03038951
124 ms
weekendmaids.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
weekendmaids.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
weekendmaids.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weekendmaids.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weekendmaids.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weekendmaids.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weekend Maid S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: