Access weighingscales.com. Quality Weighing Scales direct from www.weighingscales.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.321

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

weighingscales.com

330 ms

index.htm

604 ms

bootstrap.min.css

237 ms

idangerous.swiper.css

350 ms

font-awesome.min.css

454 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Weighingscales.com, 67% (45 requests) were made to Content.weighingscales.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Content.weighingscales.com.

Content Size

644.3 kB

After Optimization

521.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Weighingscales.com main page is 644.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 405.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 52.3 kB

Original 57.1 kB
After minification 39.3 kB
After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.9 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

Original 405.4 kB
After minification 391.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weighing Scales images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

Original 92.5 kB
After minification 92.5 kB
After compression 71.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

Original 89.2 kB
After minification 89.2 kB
After compression 53.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weighingscales.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weighing Scales. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weighingscales.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Weighingscales.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

weighingscales.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weighing Scales. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Quality Weighing Scales direct from www.weighingscales.com

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

weighingscales.com

index.htm

bootstrap.min.css

idangerous.swiper.css

font-awesome.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

weighingscales.com

index.htm

bootstrap.min.css

idangerous.swiper.css

font-awesome.min.css

css

style.css

avl.css

logo-9.png

440-Ohaus-Adventurer-AX-Analytical.jpg

Ohaus-Valor-4000.jpg

Brecknell-WB-521.jpg

Excell-SK130.jpg

440-Ohaus-Pioneer-PX-Analytical.jpg

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

idangerous.swiper.min.js

global.js

jquery.jscrollpane.min.js

about-1.jpg

excell-fd-110-series.jpg

Baxtran-ABD.jpg

Measuretek-PS-105.jpg

Locosc-LP7610.jpg

Baxtran-ss-series.jpg

440-t-scale-t28-flat-smallscoop.jpg

AnD-SJWP.jpg

ohaus-valor-4000.jpg

T-Scale-QHC.jpg

CSG-Boxed-M1-Weight-Set.jpg

CSG-LP-Platform.jpg

locosc-LPB.jpg

locosc-LPT-pallet-scale.jpg

Salter-Brecknell-235-6s-with-pan.jpg

Locosc-LP7911-with-remote.jpg

440-Seca-875.jpg

Seca-813.jpg

Ohaus-Adventurer-AX-Precision-round.jpg

Ohaus-Scout-SKX-square.jpg

AnD-GH.jpg

Ohaus-MB23.jpg

CSG-vet-scale.jpg

vetta-macchi-VA.jpg

440-excell-pw-ta-platform.jpg