Tools & Wizards About Us
weightdestroyer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

weightdestroyer.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

170 ms

Resources Loaded

396 ms

Page Rendered

501 ms

weightdestroyer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit weightdestroyer.com now to see the best up-to-date Weightdestroyer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weightdestroyer.com

Visit weightdestroyer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Weightdestroyer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 897 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weightdestroyer.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weightdestroyer.com

170 ms

cloudflare.min.js

35 ms

style.css

69 ms

ga.js

23 ms

img02.jpg

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Weightdestroyer.com, 18% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (170 ms) belongs to the original domain Weightdestroyer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

141.3 kB

After Optimization

133.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Weightdestroyer.com main page is 141.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 112.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 53% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 112.7 kB
  • After minification 111.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weightdestroyer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 128 B

  • Original 18.7 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weightdestroyer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weightdestroyer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

weightdestroyer.com

weightdestroyer.com

170 ms

cloudflare.min.js

cloudflare.min.js

35 ms

style.css

style.css

69 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

img02.jpg

img02.jpg

85 ms

img01.jpg

img01.jpg

118 ms

img03.jpg

img03.jpg

112 ms

img05.gif

img05.gif

95 ms

tata.jpg

tata.jpg

149 ms

img04.jpg

img04.jpg

84 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

20 ms

Accessibility Review

weightdestroyer.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

weightdestroyer.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

weightdestroyer.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weightdestroyer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Weightdestroyer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

weightdestroyer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weightdestroyer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: