Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

560 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

0 ms

weisseberg.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit weisseberg.ru now to see the best up-to-date Weisseberg content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about weisseberg.ru

Visit weisseberg.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Weisseberg.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 560 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weisseberg.ru performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weisseberg.ru

560 ms

weisseberg.ru

580 ms

wsberg.ru

830 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Weisseberg.ru, 33% (1 request) were made to Wsberg.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (830 ms) relates to the external source Wsberg.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

501.0 kB

After Optimization

470.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Weisseberg.ru main page is 501.0 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 323.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 68 B

  • Original 260 B
  • After minification 260 B
  • After compression 192 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68 B or 26% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 323.2 kB
  • After minification 295.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weisseberg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 466 B

  • Original 131.0 kB
  • After minification 131.0 kB
  • After compression 130.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 44.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weisseberg.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

weisseberg.ru accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

weisseberg.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weisseberg.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Weisseberg.ru main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weisseberg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: