4.6 sec in total
339 ms
3.9 sec
342 ms
Welcome to weje.io homepage info - get ready to check Weje best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about weje.io
Visualize your ideas on Weje's canvas, group and share ideas and brainstorms on this collaboration software platform, communicate with your team live
Visit weje.ioWe analyzed Weje.io page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
weje.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value9.5 s
11/100
10%
Value11,700 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.349
32/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
339 ms
173 ms
247 ms
354 ms
256 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Weje.io, 14% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Weje.io.
Page size can be reduced by 455.6 kB (33%)
1.4 MB
940.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Weje.io main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 569.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weje images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 369.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weje.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)
64
30
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weje. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
weje.io
339 ms
app.css
173 ms
marketing.js
247 ms
appStyle.css
354 ms
style.css
256 ms
optimize.js
86 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
272 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
280 ms
main.css
426 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
344 ms
js_composer.min.css
401 ms
css2
64 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
48 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
48 ms
gsap.min.js
57 ms
ScrollTrigger.min.js
81 ms
appAnimation.js
398 ms
appScript.js
433 ms
owl.carousel.css
437 ms
owl.theme.default.css
454 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
79 ms
jquery.js
643 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
462 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1077 ms
main.js
527 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
641 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
643 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
1074 ms
gtm.js
46 ms
top-post-badge.svg
111 ms
SebDEpOwO08
142 ms
r42PzT_im6Y
138 ms
oWm7_BOoKdM
136 ms
UMiR7ej1xbM
253 ms
tEnzwjHyoZk
134 ms
top-post-badge.svg
249 ms
top-post-badge.svg
252 ms
logo.svg
683 ms
template-thumb-1.jpg
692 ms
template-thumb-2.jpg
689 ms
template-thumb-3.jpg
691 ms
medal-g21-147x191.png
685 ms
footer-logo.svg
686 ms
google-play.png
687 ms
normalize.min.css
660 ms
www-player.css
15 ms
www-embed-player.js
58 ms
base.js
126 ms
ad_status.js
259 ms
special-style.css
194 ms
FaW0q-y8JjmoU9T0UDvbGph-S7KEa5MvRd-6bYW3ujg.js
347 ms
embed.js
96 ms
id
226 ms
menu-arrow.svg
273 ms
more.svg
275 ms
Create
774 ms
Create
771 ms
Create
774 ms
Create
773 ms
Create
1370 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
698 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
699 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
1309 ms
Poppins-Regular.woff
1309 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
1313 ms
Poppins-Medium.woff
1309 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff
1312 ms
Poppins-Light.woff
1308 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff
1313 ms
Poppins-ExtraLight.woff
1308 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff
1311 ms
Poppins-Thin.woff
1306 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
1312 ms
Poppins-SemiBold.woff
1307 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
1311 ms
Poppins-ExtraBold.woff
1627 ms
Poppins-Bold.woff
1628 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff
1313 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
1312 ms
Poppins-Black.woff
1628 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99e.woff
1314 ms
NotoSans-Regular.woff
1630 ms
NotoSans-Medium.woff
1628 ms
NotoSans-Light.woff
1627 ms
NotoSans-ExtraLight.woff
1696 ms
NotoSans-Thin.woff
1734 ms
NotoSans-SemiBold.woff
1735 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9e.woff
1313 ms
NotoSans-Bold.woff
1691 ms
NotoSans-ExtraBold.woff
1735 ms
NotoSans-Black.woff
1773 ms
GenerateIT
386 ms
GenerateIT
385 ms
GenerateIT
383 ms
GenerateIT
275 ms
GenerateIT
108 ms
weje.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
weje.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
weje.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weje.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weje.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weje.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weje. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: