Tools & Wizards About Us
wekeep.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

wekeep.co

Wafeq – Accounting software for modern businesses | Wafeq

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

464 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

wekeep.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wekeep content for United Arab Emirates. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wekeep.co

Send invoices or purchase orders, manage your inventory and your payroll, and get over 30 reports to manage your company, all in one software.

Visit wekeep.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Wekeep.co page load time and found that the first response time was 464 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wekeep.co performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wafeq.com

464 ms

en

553 ms

4d11bc1f0196684a.css

201 ms

09c56822f2533a00.css

192 ms

4ee18b1b9acd360b.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Wekeep.co, 15% (9 requests) were made to Wafeq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (976 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-public.wafeq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 512.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wekeep.co main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 448.7 kB

  • Original 525.1 kB
  • After minification 525.0 kB
  • After compression 76.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 448.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 286.2 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wekeep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 986.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 64.6 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wekeep.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (78%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wekeep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wafeq.com

www.wafeq.com

464 ms

en

en

553 ms

4d11bc1f0196684a.css

4d11bc1f0196684a.css

201 ms

09c56822f2533a00.css

09c56822f2533a00.css

192 ms

4ee18b1b9acd360b.css

4ee18b1b9acd360b.css

187 ms

polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js

polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js

428 ms

webpack-b9741d78a1d68d06.js

webpack-b9741d78a1d68d06.js

189 ms

framework-b0ec748c7a4c483a.js

framework-b0ec748c7a4c483a.js

427 ms

main-2df56aba89756ac3.js

main-2df56aba89756ac3.js

469 ms

_app-14f1cbac775f24b2.js

_app-14f1cbac775f24b2.js

675 ms

7112840a-72dd49095039ae08.js

7112840a-72dd49095039ae08.js

484 ms

cccc6244-59090523889b50f0.js

cccc6244-59090523889b50f0.js

486 ms

605040ef-3c36b16d681eb74b.js

605040ef-3c36b16d681eb74b.js

484 ms

d0c16330-ca089bc976ecba2d.js

d0c16330-ca089bc976ecba2d.js

427 ms

252f366e-ea2641ab20eb5028.js

252f366e-ea2641ab20eb5028.js

428 ms

78e521c3-f120f17d26cd9603.js

78e521c3-f120f17d26cd9603.js

483 ms

1bfc9850-f184bfe8261bca89.js

1bfc9850-f184bfe8261bca89.js

468 ms

d3048c20-aabe9ce645a75149.js

d3048c20-aabe9ce645a75149.js

483 ms

d2094a0f-4bbcd561316e868d.js

d2094a0f-4bbcd561316e868d.js

602 ms

ee9ce975-6078dd6c8b223a9b.js

ee9ce975-6078dd6c8b223a9b.js

601 ms

1664-097cf1773184f113.js

1664-097cf1773184f113.js

619 ms

5742-29e0bd9d09747fa7.js

5742-29e0bd9d09747fa7.js

607 ms

2800-78784cb8f443e26c.js

2800-78784cb8f443e26c.js

609 ms

2955-fa0d4fca3b7137cd.js

2955-fa0d4fca3b7137cd.js

720 ms

9566-bdf9a4915e53cc68.js

9566-bdf9a4915e53cc68.js

744 ms

3307-908cc4fed611a8b4.js

3307-908cc4fed611a8b4.js

802 ms

2229-24cbd5939ab133b4.js

2229-24cbd5939ab133b4.js

753 ms

9254-c06b914ce5e0ab11.js

9254-c06b914ce5e0ab11.js

758 ms

5675-8105f2c918fd7a7d.js

5675-8105f2c918fd7a7d.js

794 ms

2076-ab03fdad91875f7f.js

2076-ab03fdad91875f7f.js

829 ms

5005-34072f66311f80f6.js

5005-34072f66311f80f6.js

885 ms

2541-14234452cf89c03a.js

2541-14234452cf89c03a.js

761 ms

1863-7a60ba6db7902741.js

1863-7a60ba6db7902741.js

913 ms

7087-9bf5d015b03a595d.js

7087-9bf5d015b03a595d.js

897 ms

2143-a8741dc8c173e96c.js

2143-a8741dc8c173e96c.js

920 ms

3860-23e1b15a352c9918.js

3860-23e1b15a352c9918.js

804 ms

5981-d4e56f316fee458a.js

5981-d4e56f316fee458a.js

970 ms

2589-62ed779734c9d457.js

2589-62ed779734c9d457.js

976 ms

image

image

145 ms

8269-659405e65d611849.js

8269-659405e65d611849.js

860 ms

8771-55b22148bf7a6312.js

8771-55b22148bf7a6312.js

719 ms

2542-ee9683153fb5c644.js

2542-ee9683153fb5c644.js

848 ms

image

image

171 ms

image

image

289 ms

image

image

365 ms

image

image

304 ms

image

image

369 ms

image

image

404 ms

7594-32615bb5b97bc3f8.js

7594-32615bb5b97bc3f8.js

634 ms

6958-a756414fda56e769.js

6958-a756414fda56e769.js

509 ms

%5BcountryLang%5D-814b00bf332035eb.js

%5BcountryLang%5D-814b00bf332035eb.js

634 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

666 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

559 ms

Wafeq-Regular.df300ab2.woff2

Wafeq-Regular.df300ab2.woff2

525 ms

Wafeq-Medium.44f5d13f.woff2

Wafeq-Medium.44f5d13f.woff2

637 ms

Wafeq-Light.b7b874c4.woff2

Wafeq-Light.b7b874c4.woff2

669 ms

Wafeq-ExtraLight.088ac471.woff2

Wafeq-ExtraLight.088ac471.woff2

816 ms

Wafeq-Thin.4e1d0e3b.woff2

Wafeq-Thin.4e1d0e3b.woff2

748 ms

Wafeq-SemiBold.c44050db.woff2

Wafeq-SemiBold.c44050db.woff2

701 ms

Wafeq-Bold.1cbebb8c.woff2

Wafeq-Bold.1cbebb8c.woff2

748 ms

Wafeq-ExtraBold.7b4ba8db.woff2

Wafeq-ExtraBold.7b4ba8db.woff2

631 ms

Accessibility Review

wekeep.co accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wekeep.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wekeep.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wekeep.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wekeep.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wekeep.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wekeep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: