Tools & Wizards About Us
welove.makeup screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

welove.makeup

Makeup Tutorials, Tips, Trends & Reviews | Makeup.com

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

welove.makeup screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Welove content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about welove.makeup

Makeup.com is your source for makeup tutorials, tips, trends, and reviews. Our makeup experts will guide you through the world of makeup, one product at a time.

Visit welove.makeup

Key Findings

We analyzed Welove.makeup page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

welove.makeup performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

welove.makeup

51 ms

videos.makeup.com

56 ms

www.makeup.com

3606 ms

56b5423f9d104269832318f6fa1f7ba9.ashx

45 ms

otSDKStub.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Welove.makeup, 58% (7 requests) were made to Makeup.com and 17% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source Makeup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.2 kB (39%)

Content Size

461.6 kB

After Optimization

282.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Welove.makeup main page is 461.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 201.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 178.5 kB

  • Original 201.4 kB
  • After minification 149.3 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 52.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 154.8 kB
  • After minification 154.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Welove images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 695 B

  • Original 80.9 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 80.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Welove.makeup has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (56%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Welove. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

welove.makeup

welove.makeup

51 ms

videos.makeup.com

videos.makeup.com

56 ms

www.makeup.com

www.makeup.com

3606 ms

56b5423f9d104269832318f6fa1f7ba9.ashx

56b5423f9d104269832318f6fa1f7ba9.ashx

45 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

34 ms

38c89583a40a4c9cbed00bed0cbde099.ashx

38c89583a40a4c9cbed00bed0cbde099.ashx

49 ms

bundle.css

bundle.css

65 ms

vendors.bundle.js

vendors.bundle.js

47 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

31 ms

6b7bb05a-93e4-4e8a-8017-53cd52ba93b0.json

6b7bb05a-93e4-4e8a-8017-53cd52ba93b0.json

63 ms

mdc-homepage-banner-white.jpg

mdc-homepage-banner-white.jpg

31 ms

location

location

72 ms

Accessibility Review

welove.makeup accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

welove.makeup best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

welove.makeup SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Welove.makeup can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Welove.makeup main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

welove.makeup

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Welove. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: