Tools & Wizards About Us
welovekit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

welovekit.com

welovekit.com - welovekit Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

901 ms

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

welovekit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit welovekit.com now to see the best up-to-date Welovekit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about welovekit.com

welovekit.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, welovekit.com has it all. We hope you find...

Visit welovekit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Welovekit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 901 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

welovekit.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value104.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.welovekit.com

901 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

styles.css

580 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

500 ms

style.css

501 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Welovekit.com, 93% (52 requests) were made to Psmsportswear.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Psmsportswear.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 948.4 kB (68%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

445.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Welovekit.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 983.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 20.7 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 195.9 kB
  • After minification 186.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Welovekit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 757.0 kB

  • Original 983.5 kB
  • After minification 763.4 kB
  • After compression 226.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 757.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 164.8 kB

  • Original 192.2 kB
  • After minification 145.6 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Welovekit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (65%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Welovekit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.welovekit.com

www.welovekit.com

901 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

styles.css

styles.css

580 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

500 ms

style.css

style.css

501 ms

easybanner.css

easybanner.css

509 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

510 ms

styles.css

styles.css

519 ms

sagePaySuite.css

sagePaySuite.css

572 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

652 ms

jquery.noconflict.js

jquery.noconflict.js

591 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

754 ms

validation.js

validation.js

606 ms

builder.js

builder.js

645 ms

effects.js

effects.js

655 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

666 ms

controls.js

controls.js

691 ms

slider.js

slider.js

717 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

725 ms

jquery-1.7.2.noConflict.js

jquery-1.7.2.noConflict.js

886 ms

jquery.aw-showcase.min.js

jquery.aw-showcase.min.js

746 ms

js.js

js.js

790 ms

form.js

form.js

791 ms

menu.js

menu.js

800 ms

translate.js

translate.js

827 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

832 ms

protohover.js

protohover.js

859 ms

bookmarks.js

bookmarks.js

862 ms

company.js

company.js

871 ms

howtoorder.js

howtoorder.js

904 ms

accordion-psm.js

accordion-psm.js

912 ms

scroller.js

scroller.js

943 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

935 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

946 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

962 ms

jquery_noconflict.js

jquery_noconflict.js

981 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

987 ms

jquery.cycle.js

jquery.cycle.js

1009 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

111 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

112 ms

gogole.png

gogole.png

108 ms

WLK-Header-New.gif

WLK-Header-New.gif

109 ms

New-Main-Homepage-Slider.gif

New-Main-Homepage-Slider.gif

306 ms

phone_icon.png

phone_icon.png

110 ms

email_icon.png

email_icon.png

169 ms

download.png

download.png

177 ms

designs&prices.png

designs&prices.png

360 ms

DurhamUniversityS.jpg

DurhamUniversityS.jpg

334 ms

comingsoon.png

comingsoon.png

424 ms

footer_img.png

footer_img.png

304 ms

welo_icon.png

welo_icon.png

287 ms

psm.png

psm.png

361 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

371 ms

avgr65w_0-webfont.woff

avgr65w_0-webfont.woff

382 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

Accessibility Review

welovekit.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

welovekit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

welovekit.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Welovekit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Welovekit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

welovekit.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Welovekit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: