Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

werecommend.info

WeRecommend is a collection of independent hospitality associates  who recommend each other

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

773 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

878 ms

werecommend.info screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing We Recommend content for Belarus. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about werecommend.info

WeRecommend is a collection of independent hospitality associates who recommend each other, secure in the knowledge that they are committed to provide uncompromising levels of guest comfort and care.

Visit werecommend.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Werecommend.info page load time and found that the first response time was 773 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

werecommend.info performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

werecommend.info

773 ms

werecommend.info

1317 ms

style.css

254 ms

b4.jpg

1761 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Werecommend.info and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Werecommend.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

589.8 kB

After Optimization

537.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Werecommend.info main page is 589.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 586.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 676 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 603 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 676 B or 53% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 586.5 kB
  • After minification 536.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. We Recommend images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 252 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Werecommend.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of We Recommend. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

werecommend.info accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

werecommend.info best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

werecommend.info SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Werecommend.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Werecommend.info main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of We Recommend. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: