6.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.6 sec
195 ms
Visit wereview.in now to see the best up-to-date We Review content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wereview.in
Real reviews from real users in India! Check out the latest reviews on products, healthcare, books, movies, and electronic gadgets.
Visit wereview.inWe analyzed Wereview.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
wereview.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value1,840 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.38
27/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
1074 ms
2085 ms
818 ms
47 ms
1549 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Wereview.in, 6% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wereview.in.
Page size can be reduced by 107.6 kB (20%)
532.7 kB
425.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Wereview.in main page is 532.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 206.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. We Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wereview.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (55%)
29
13
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of We Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wereview.in
1074 ms
wereview.in
2085 ms
dgmav.css
818 ms
css
47 ms
dgmav.css
1549 ms
dgmav.css
1597 ms
dgmav.css
1201 ms
jquery.min.js
1604 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1207 ms
somo.sticky.menu.js
1230 ms
adsbygoogle.js
73 ms
adsbygoogle.js
121 ms
ta.js
1319 ms
pixel-geo.min.js
1319 ms
yuzo.min.js
1320 ms
dismiss.js
1536 ms
jquery.metadata.js
1602 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
1610 ms
bg-dots.png
419 ms
newborn-baby-shopping-list-250x160.png
801 ms
bitcoin-price-graph-2016-250x160.png
432 ms
minimalist-wereview-1-250x160.jpeg
730 ms
centrum-women-250x160.jpg
779 ms
best-vanilla-essence-india-250x160.jpg
798 ms
amazon-india-cover-250x160.jpg
1222 ms
fire-stick-channels-apps-250x160.png
1249 ms
The-Moms-Co-Boddy-Butter-Pregnancy-250x160.jpeg
1143 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
34 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
34 ms
star.gif
1063 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
12 ms
js
62 ms
wereview.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wereview.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wereview.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wereview.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wereview.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wereview.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of We Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: