Tools & Wizards About Us
westwaterconstruction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

westwaterconstruction.com

WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION INC | Sarasota Luxury Home Builder and Design

Page Load Speed

848 ms in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

631 ms

Page Rendered

168 ms

westwaterconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about westwaterconstruction.com

Visit westwaterconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Westwaterconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 799 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

westwaterconstruction.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.242

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

westwaterconstruction.com

49 ms

westwaterconstruction.com

47 ms

cf7ic-style.css

17 ms

style.min.css

51 ms

styles.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Westwaterconstruction.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (246 ms) belongs to the original domain Westwaterconstruction.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

867.1 kB

After Optimization

800.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Westwaterconstruction.com main page is 867.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 430.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 69.1 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 97.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 430.5 kB
  • After minification 430.5 kB
  • After compression 427.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 270.4 kB
  • After minification 270.0 kB
  • After compression 262.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Westwaterconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (90%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

westwaterconstruction.com

westwaterconstruction.com

49 ms

westwaterconstruction.com

westwaterconstruction.com

47 ms

cf7ic-style.css

cf7ic-style.css

17 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

51 ms

styles.css

styles.css

39 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

34 ms

latest.css

latest.css

39 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

32 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

59 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

54 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

69 ms

style.css

style.css

56 ms

dripicons.css

dripicons.css

59 ms

kiko-all.css

kiko-all.css

107 ms

font-awesome-5.min.css

font-awesome-5.min.css

109 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

71 ms

print.css

print.css

107 ms

style_dynamic.css

style_dynamic.css

113 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

118 ms

style_dynamic_responsive.css

style_dynamic_responsive.css

124 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

126 ms

css

css

38 ms

core-dashboard.min.css

core-dashboard.min.css

115 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

113 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

166 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

213 ms

css

css

56 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

224 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

222 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

222 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

241 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

241 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

243 ms

index.js

index.js

243 ms

index.js

index.js

243 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

244 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

246 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

245 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

245 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

240 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

225 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

219 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

217 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

220 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

217 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

210 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

210 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

204 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

205 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

205 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

196 ms

droppable.min.js

droppable.min.js

158 ms

progressbar.min.js

progressbar.min.js

159 ms

selectable.min.js

selectable.min.js

161 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

153 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

154 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

155 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

145 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

146 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

103 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

57 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

50 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

98 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

49 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

87 ms

font

font

128 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

114 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

112 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

110 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

109 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

108 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

108 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

120 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

120 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

119 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

120 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

118 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

116 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

154 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

157 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

129 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

124 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

151 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

147 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

150 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

151 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

152 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

149 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

150 ms

skrollr.js

skrollr.js

172 ms

default_dynamic.js

default_dynamic.js

156 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

158 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

156 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

156 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

156 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

171 ms

LOGO-WW-NO-PHRASE-NO-BG-600.png

LOGO-WW-NO-PHRASE-NO-BG-600.png

168 ms

logo-ww-beige-mobile-600.png

logo-ww-beige-mobile-600.png

168 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

166 ms

ww-photo-cube.jpg

ww-photo-cube.jpg

142 ms

LOGO-JUST-BIG-LETTERS-WW-600.png

LOGO-JUST-BIG-LETTERS-WW-600.png

140 ms

font

font

58 ms

font

font

58 ms

Accessibility Review

westwaterconstruction.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

westwaterconstruction.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

westwaterconstruction.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Westwaterconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Westwaterconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

westwaterconstruction.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: