2.7 sec in total
43 ms
2.1 sec
652 ms
Visit wetakecare.in now to see the best up-to-date Wetakecare content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wetakecare.in
We are Providing the Best Physiotherapy in India, Over 35 Years Experience Doctors team Best Physiotherapy in Delhi, - Call at 88 60 90 1999
Visit wetakecare.inWe analyzed Wetakecare.in page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wetakecare.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value23.9 s
0/100
10%
Value40,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.113
86/100
15%
Value74.9 s
0/100
10%
43 ms
96 ms
77 ms
52 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 157 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Wetakecare.in, 19% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wetakecare.in.
Page size can be reduced by 359.4 kB (25%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Wetakecare.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 326.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 326.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 636 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wetakecare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wetakecare.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (88%)
112
13
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wetakecare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 47 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wetakecare.in
43 ms
wetakecare.in
96 ms
css
77 ms
frontend.css
52 ms
frontend.css
62 ms
all.min.css
68 ms
styles.css
63 ms
cvec_post_841.css
73 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
84 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
85 ms
frontend.min.css
74 ms
swiper.min.css
80 ms
e-swiper.min.css
81 ms
post-29.css
85 ms
frontend.min.css
101 ms
global.css
97 ms
animations.min.css
91 ms
post-841.css
124 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
120 ms
pum-site-styles.css
121 ms
style.css
124 ms
font-awesome-all.css
125 ms
flaticon.css
140 ms
owl.css
141 ms
bootstrap.css
144 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
132 ms
animate.css
134 ms
color.css
142 ms
global.css
152 ms
style.css
154 ms
theme-style.css
162 ms
responsive.css
158 ms
css
70 ms
flaticon-icon.css
160 ms
fontawesome.min.css
162 ms
solid.min.css
168 ms
jquery.min.js
183 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
180 ms
js
115 ms
js
181 ms
email-decode.min.js
142 ms
lgUrl.php
434 ms
style.css
292 ms
widget-image-carousel.min.css
273 ms
widget-heading.min.css
265 ms
widget-video.min.css
262 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
380 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
376 ms
css
37 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
371 ms
widget-divider.min.css
371 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
370 ms
widget-menu-anchor.min.css
368 ms
post-496.css
377 ms
frontend.min.js
375 ms
hooks.min.js
365 ms
i18n.min.js
343 ms
css
33 ms
index.js
339 ms
index.js
337 ms
jquery.ive-countdown.min.js
518 ms
js.cookie.min.js
511 ms
jquery.iframetracker.min.js
510 ms
aicp.min.js
506 ms
popper.min.js
506 ms
bootstrap.min.js
501 ms
owl.js
550 ms
wow.js
540 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
541 ms
appear.js
530 ms
scrollbar.js
529 ms
nav-tool.js
528 ms
script.js
591 ms
joinchat-lite.min.js
691 ms
core.min.js
684 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
672 ms
scripts.js
671 ms
gallery.js
568 ms
fbevents.js
253 ms
gtm.js
252 ms
countbox.js
566 ms
testimonial.js
557 ms
client.js
558 ms
countbar.js
553 ms
bannerslider.js
557 ms
progresscircle.js
429 ms
service.js
433 ms
team.js
441 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
439 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
441 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
440 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
255 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
255 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
306 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
417 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
418 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
418 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-1UA.ttf
420 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf
419 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-1UA.ttf
429 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
418 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-1UA.ttf
431 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf
420 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-1UA.ttf
433 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
419 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYi1UA.ttf
420 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
421 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4i1UA.ttf
422 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
422 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYi1UA.ttf
424 ms
frontend.min.js
440 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
423 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
435 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf
437 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
426 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf
426 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
199 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
250 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
237 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
427 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
429 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
428 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
431 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
430 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
431 ms
frontend.min.js
432 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
432 ms
underscore.min.js
433 ms
wp-util.min.js
431 ms
frontend.min.js
431 ms
wpforms.min.js
430 ms
wpforms-conditional-logic-fields.min.js
252 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
253 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
303 ms
mailcheck.min.js
250 ms
punycode.min.js
242 ms
Flaticon.svg
1206 ms
Flaticon.woff
301 ms
Flaticon.svg
1215 ms
Flaticon.woff
299 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
694 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
683 ms
fa-light-300.woff
685 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
635 ms
eicons.woff
531 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
937 ms
cropped-cropped-Logo-Name-PNG.png
532 ms
Logo-Name-PNG.png
524 ms
banner-2-pac77f7kfri6nyokzdisa7g0x61nr74ue2je9hx1vw.jpeg
526 ms
banner-1-pac77ce1v9ebp4sofuawkq5n50fk43tndokxto18ek.jpeg
517 ms
banner-3-pac77iyx73nbyej4df5ak6hvapj4lzjrql5c6lrh70.jpeg
517 ms
wetakecare.in
519 ms
news-10-370x290-1.jpg
515 ms
submit-spin.svg
515 ms
Logo-Only-PNG.png
513 ms
1-400x400.jpg
511 ms
abwhatsapp.png
510 ms
wetakecare.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wetakecare.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wetakecare.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wetakecare.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wetakecare.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wetakecare.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wetakecare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: