Tools & Wizards About Us
wetravel.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

wetravel.to

WeTravel - Booking and Payment Solutions for Travel Companies of Any Size

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

941 ms

wetravel.to screenshot

About Website

Visit wetravel.to now to see the best up-to-date We Travel content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wetravel.to

Use WeTravel to create stunning trip pages, collect payments, add payment plans, manage bookings, and pay suppliers. All with no monthly and setup fees.

Visit wetravel.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Wetravel.to page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wetravel.to performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wetravel.to

164 ms

www.wetravel.to

1438 ms

design.css

15 ms

vendor.dd3c75ba357d48fe081c.bundle.js

91 ms

gtm.js

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Wetravel.to, 29% (11 requests) were made to Filepicker.io and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Wetravel.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 616.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wetravel.to main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 134.5 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. We Travel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 128.7 kB

  • Original 216.3 kB
  • After minification 216.3 kB
  • After compression 87.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 326.6 kB

  • Original 379.8 kB
  • After minification 379.6 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wetravel.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 326.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of We Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wetravel.to

wetravel.to

164 ms

www.wetravel.to

www.wetravel.to

1438 ms

design.css

design.css

15 ms

vendor.dd3c75ba357d48fe081c.bundle.js

vendor.dd3c75ba357d48fe081c.bundle.js

91 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

169 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

88 ms

convert

convert

201 ms

convert

convert

139 ms

convert

convert

142 ms

convert

convert

130 ms

convert

convert

140 ms

convert

convert

139 ms

convert

convert

194 ms

convert

convert

312 ms

convert

convert

210 ms

convert

convert

236 ms

convert

convert

246 ms

top_image.jpg

top_image.jpg

181 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

55 ms

casey.jpg

casey.jpg

85 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

269 ms

yusuke.jpg

yusuke.jpg

85 ms

brian.jpg

brian.jpg

86 ms

avatar_thumb_placeholder.jpg

avatar_thumb_placeholder.jpg

85 ms

mba-bottom.jpg

mba-bottom.jpg

238 ms

financialtimes.jpg

financialtimes.jpg

108 ms

partner-1.jpg

partner-1.jpg

111 ms

ICTFund.jpg

ICTFund.jpg

112 ms

partner-3.jpg

partner-3.jpg

150 ms

partner-4.jpg

partner-4.jpg

151 ms

partner-5.jpg

partner-5.jpg

150 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

89 ms

41 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

64 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

66 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

34 ms

nr-852.min.js

nr-852.min.js

44 ms

Accessibility Review

wetravel.to accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wetravel.to best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wetravel.to SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wetravel.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wetravel.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wetravel.to

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of We Travel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: