Tools & Wizards About Us
wgp.global screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

wgp.global

WGP Global

Page Load Speed

592 ms in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

334 ms

Page Rendered

90 ms

wgp.global screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wgp.global homepage info - get ready to check WGP best content right away, or after learning these important things about wgp.global

Visit wgp.global

Key Findings

We analyzed Wgp.global page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 424 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wgp.global performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wgp.global

168 ms

screen.css

83 ms

js

63 ms

holding-page.png

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Wgp.global, 25% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (168 ms) belongs to the original domain Wgp.global.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

11.8 kB

After Optimization

9.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wgp.global main page is 11.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 227 B

  • Original 570 B
  • After minification 501 B
  • After compression 343 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 69 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 227 B or 40% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WGP needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 906 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 637 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wgp.global needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 906 B or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WGP. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

wgp.global

wgp.global

168 ms

screen.css

screen.css

83 ms

js

js

63 ms

holding-page.png

holding-page.png

82 ms

Accessibility Review

wgp.global accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

wgp.global best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

wgp.global SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wgp.global can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Wgp.global main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wgp.global

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WGP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: