19.9 sec in total
2.2 sec
17.1 sec
712 ms
Welcome to whaleshark.co.nz homepage info - get ready to check Whale Shark best content right away, or after learning these important things about whaleshark.co.nz
Experts in infographics. Whale Shark Creative, Auckland, New Zealand. Infographics » Graphic Design » Data Visualisation.
Visit whaleshark.co.nzWe analyzed Whaleshark.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 17.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
whaleshark.co.nz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value52.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
2183 ms
1034 ms
1057 ms
1075 ms
1072 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Whaleshark.co.nz, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Whaleshark.co.nz.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (11%)
11.5 MB
10.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Whaleshark.co.nz main page is 11.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whale Shark needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whaleshark.co.nz has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (58%)
81
34
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whale Shark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whaleshark.co.nz
2183 ms
style.min.css
1034 ms
styles.css
1057 ms
portfolio.css
1075 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
1072 ms
grid-system.css
1042 ms
style.css
1059 ms
header-perma-transparent.css
2061 ms
element-fancy-box.css
2120 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
2078 ms
element-clients.css
2122 ms
caroufredsel.css
2123 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
2088 ms
css
41 ms
responsive.css
3088 ms
select2.css
3105 ms
skin-original.css
3114 ms
menu-dynamic.css
3144 ms
js_composer.min.css
3174 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
3158 ms
css
55 ms
jquery.min.js
4123 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
4166 ms
email-decode.min.js
3112 ms
animate.min.css
4198 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
4341 ms
core.css
4341 ms
fullscreen-legacy.css
4343 ms
index.js
5142 ms
index.js
5200 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
5207 ms
isotope.min.js
5273 ms
salient-portfolio.js
5295 ms
touchswipe.min.js
5256 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
6209 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
6228 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
6227 ms
priority.js
6312 ms
transit.min.js
6295 ms
waypoints.js
5305 ms
hoverintent.min.js
6258 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
6211 ms
anime.min.js
6205 ms
superfish.js
6280 ms
init.js
6550 ms
select2.min.js
5347 ms
comment-reply.min.js
6391 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
6212 ms
analytics.js
174 ms
WSC-primary-RGB-logo-purple-SHARK-75.png
4284 ms
WSC-white-shark-100-f.png
4290 ms
WSC-onecolour-RGB-logo-white-150.png
4290 ms
WSC-primary-RGB-logo-purple-150x65.png
4474 ms
LI-Badges-tilef.jpg
5148 ms
LI-Insights-2.jpg
5171 ms
datacom-tile.jpg
5182 ms
SB-1-thumb.jpg
5236 ms
ssp2016-thumb.jpg
5287 ms
Piletech-GSHP-tile.jpg
5503 ms
forest-bond-tile.jpg
6170 ms
genesis-tile1.jpg
6183 ms
piletech-tile.jpg
6048 ms
risk-infographic-tile.jpg
5353 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8JoA.woff
84 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8JoA.woff
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
134 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
135 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
6497 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
137 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
135 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
134 ms
icomoon.woff
6362 ms
collect
115 ms
js
84 ms
WSC-white-shark-80.png
2266 ms
akc.png
2916 ms
airnz1.png
2968 ms
datacom-logo-f.png
2949 ms
piletech.png
3280 ms
sc1.png
3319 ms
celc.png
3463 ms
sb.png
3940 ms
snow.png
4001 ms
ivhq1.png
3993 ms
risk.png
4343 ms
Screen-Shot-2024-03-05-at-9.52.37-PM.png
4422 ms
grid.png
4480 ms
aotea-slider.jpg
4971 ms
LI-Insights-4.jpg
5081 ms
ssp2016-31.jpg
5787 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3195 ms
whaleshark.co.nz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whaleshark.co.nz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
whaleshark.co.nz SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whaleshark.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whaleshark.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whaleshark.co.nz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whale Shark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: