Tools & Wizards About Us
wharfclinic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

wharfclinic.com

Wharf Clinic | london | skin care | laser hair removal

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

70 ms

wharfclinic.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wharfclinic.com homepage info - get ready to check Wharf Clinic best content right away, or after learning these important things about wharfclinic.com

Wharf Clinic ​Advanced non-invasive, non-surgical cosmetic & beauty services laser hair removal canary wharf laser hair removal e14 face treatment body treatment canary wharf

Visit wharfclinic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wharfclinic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wharfclinic.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,660 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wharfclinic.com

94 ms

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

124 ms

adsbygoogle.js

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wharfclinic.com, 34% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 841.8 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

771.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wharfclinic.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 814.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 198.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 814.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 134.0 kB
  • After minification 117.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wharf Clinic needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 466.1 kB
  • After minification 466.1 kB
  • After compression 455.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (46%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wharf Clinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wharfclinic.com

www.wharfclinic.com

94 ms

minified.js

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

124 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

81 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

59 ms

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

61 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

61 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

57 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

61 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

60 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

60 ms

WharfClinic%201034.png

WharfClinic%201034.png

466 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

270 ms

11062b_62f0356712544a87b392417662c4658df000.jpg

11062b_62f0356712544a87b392417662c4658df000.jpg

145 ms

Facial.jpg

Facial.jpg

329 ms

dff918_c301348a817e4c61bf934c4be995c705f000.jpg

dff918_c301348a817e4c61bf934c4be995c705f000.jpg

439 ms

5bfb6f_c2ae26a3c5004bca9ea2b860a535f4ab~mv2.png

5bfb6f_c2ae26a3c5004bca9ea2b860a535f4ab~mv2.png

168 ms

5bfb6f_ff73ca63250240b2a3c975834afa9356~mv2.png

5bfb6f_ff73ca63250240b2a3c975834afa9356~mv2.png

149 ms

3D%20Wharf%20Clinic%20Trilogyice.png

3D%20Wharf%20Clinic%20Trilogyice.png

381 ms

suprano_titanium_logo2.jpg

suprano_titanium_logo2.jpg

439 ms

3D%20Wharf%20Clinic%20SKINTECH.png

3D%20Wharf%20Clinic%20SKINTECH.png

437 ms

3D-Ulitimate-Logo-2%20copy.jpg

3D-Ulitimate-Logo-2%20copy.jpg

524 ms

Wharf%20Clinic.png

Wharf%20Clinic.png

614 ms

Fit3D-Logo-01.png

Fit3D-Logo-01.png

684 ms

Logo_HarmonyXLPRO2.jpeg

Logo_HarmonyXLPRO2.jpeg

608 ms

d83a82cdc9ce4c839fdee728bc3fd2f9.jpg

d83a82cdc9ce4c839fdee728bc3fd2f9.jpg

440 ms

Screen-Shot-2014-11-10-at-16_19_41.png

Screen-Shot-2014-11-10-at-16_19_41.png

619 ms

NHBF%20Wharf%20Clinic.png

NHBF%20Wharf%20Clinic.png

661 ms

Wharf%20Clinic%20CEDR.png

Wharf%20Clinic%20CEDR.png

766 ms

Wharf%20Clinic.png

Wharf%20Clinic.png

792 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

154 ms

zrt_lookup_inhead.html

zrt_lookup_inhead.html

151 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

34 ms

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

34 ms

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

15 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

34 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

57 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

33 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

58 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

72 ms

179 ms

174 ms

175 ms

171 ms

170 ms

160 ms

200 ms

203 ms

203 ms

202 ms

204 ms

200 ms

ads

ads

35 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

11 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

wharfclinic.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wharfclinic.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wharfclinic.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wharfclinic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wharfclinic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wharfclinic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wharf Clinic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: