2.3 sec in total
77 ms
1.3 sec
843 ms
Visit whatcharterboat.com now to see the best up-to-date What Charter Boat content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whatcharterboat.com
Looking for an aquatic escape? Look no further whatcharterboat.com.au can help you with finding the perfect charter for your next holiday.
Visit whatcharterboat.comWe analyzed Whatcharterboat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
whatcharterboat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
77 ms
387 ms
38 ms
248 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Whatcharterboat.com, 87% (54 requests) were made to Whatcharterboat.com.au and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (504 ms) relates to the external source Whatcharterboat.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 166.3 kB (19%)
884.1 kB
717.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Whatcharterboat.com main page is 884.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 686.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. What Charter Boat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 75 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (70%)
57
17
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of What Charter Boat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whatcharterboat.com
77 ms
www.whatcharterboat.com.au
387 ms
css
38 ms
style.min.css
248 ms
menu-animation.min.css
38 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
258 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
336 ms
swiper.min.css
80 ms
post-6.css
43 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
48 ms
post-204.css
57 ms
js
64 ms
widget-posts.min.css
80 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
78 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
89 ms
style.min.js
89 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
324 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
168 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
103 ms
dom-ready.min.js
118 ms
main.js
132 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
142 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
155 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
175 ms
jquery.min.js
194 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
188 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
212 ms
hooks.min.js
211 ms
i18n.min.js
225 ms
frontend.min.js
226 ms
waypoints.min.js
242 ms
core.min.js
480 ms
frontend.min.js
250 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
257 ms
underscore.min.js
504 ms
wp-util.min.js
266 ms
frontend.min.js
271 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
277 ms
mailcheck.min.js
297 ms
api.js
42 ms
punycode.min.js
291 ms
utils.min.js
275 ms
wpforms.min.js
274 ms
What-Charter-Boat-Logo-square-s.png
341 ms
bg-01-free-img.webp
76 ms
Background-Boat-Image-White.png
64 ms
Sail-Boat-large-q58epm2wdzk4bpezi7wslzzsq23uvzx232c8796zdi.png
74 ms
Stamp-Overlay-New.png
93 ms
Cruise-Ship-Left.png
95 ms
Sail-Boat.png
112 ms
Fishing-Boat-Side-s.png
436 ms
Hire-Boat.png
113 ms
Do-I-need-certification-if-I-charter-bareboat-768x512-1-300x200.jpeg
113 ms
Why-Is-Water-Blue-300x225.jpeg
113 ms
What-is-the-difference-between-inspected-and-uninspected-yacht-charters-768x576-1-300x225.jpeg
136 ms
bg-02-free-img.webp
492 ms
signature-free-img.png
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
31 ms
Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lA.woff
47 ms
astra.woff
92 ms
embed
358 ms
js
58 ms
whatcharterboat.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
whatcharterboat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
whatcharterboat.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatcharterboat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whatcharterboat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whatcharterboat.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of What Charter Boat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: