1.2 sec in total
23 ms
602 ms
535 ms
Visit whatpods.com now to see the best up-to-date What Pods content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whatpods.com
Love podcasts more than regular people? We need intelligent devotees with a critical mind to contribute genuine, independent ratings and reviews.
Visit whatpods.comWe analyzed Whatpods.com page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
whatpods.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.052
98/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
23 ms
80 ms
44 ms
60 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Whatpods.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) belongs to the original domain Whatpods.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.2 kB (11%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Whatpods.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. What Pods images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whatpods.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (68%)
57
18
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of What Pods. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whatpods.com
23 ms
whatpods.com
80 ms
css
44 ms
css
60 ms
css
69 ms
01ce2a28-1725991565.min.css
26 ms
css
94 ms
dc040cae-1667842671.min.css
53 ms
10be0e4d-1718697637.min.css
47 ms
a4950ac3-1699423583.min.js
52 ms
1f96046a-1718697627.min.js
37 ms
js
186 ms
font-awesome.css
36 ms
index.css
41 ms
style.css
54 ms
flexslider.css
51 ms
bootstrap.min.css
54 ms
all.css
55 ms
style_v2.css
129 ms
style_v2.0.css
126 ms
style_amas.css
64 ms
style_top_mics.css
138 ms
style_onboarding.css
131 ms
select2.min.css
55 ms
jquery.js
142 ms
lottie.min.js
140 ms
adsbygoogle.js
62 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
163 ms
bootstrapvalidator.min.js
134 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
136 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
162 ms
theme.js
180 ms
common.js
179 ms
index.js
238 ms
jquery.steps.js
180 ms
toucheventsdetect.js
309 ms
like-or-dislike-comments.js
376 ms
v2.js
132 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
484 ms
select2.min.js
136 ms
jquery.cookie.js
239 ms
counter.min.js
238 ms
email-decode.min.js
238 ms
76fc090a-1718697626.min.js
238 ms
a4bc1659-1718697635.min.js
237 ms
729c08e5-1667842672.min.js
239 ms
v2.js
178 ms
giphy.gif
213 ms
bg-hero-desktop.png
149 ms
Meeting.png
148 ms
build-rolodex-mobile-image.png
148 ms
Man.png
152 ms
circle-img2.png
151 ms
circle-img3.png
152 ms
circle-img4.png
153 ms
circle-img1.png
153 ms
bg-just-for-hosts-desktop.png
154 ms
skills-knowledge.png
154 ms
headphones.png
154 ms
mic.png
155 ms
hand-sign.png
155 ms
hooray.png
157 ms
mic-hooray.png
157 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf
19 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
33 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
37 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
38 ms
whatpods.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whatpods.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
whatpods.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatpods.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whatpods.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whatpods.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of What Pods. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: