Tools & Wizards About Us
whichairline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

whichairline.com

Best airlines in 2024 | Kiwi.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

73 ms

whichairline.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to whichairline.com homepage info - get ready to check Whichairline best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about whichairline.com

Book airline tickets with the best airlines in the world. Find the best airlines to fly with in 2024 to your destination with Kiwi.com

Visit whichairline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whichairline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whichairline.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,610 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whichairline.com

61 ms

497 ms

tailwind.travel.1dbcdfa3.css

96 ms

optimize.js

41 ms

kiwicom-logo.svg

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Whichairline.com, 85% (33 requests) were made to Kiwi.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Images.kiwi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) relates to the external source Kiwi.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 376.6 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

799.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whichairline.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 682.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 376.1 kB

  • Original 436.3 kB
  • After minification 434.1 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 376.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.2 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whichairline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 572 B

  • Original 682.8 kB
  • After minification 682.8 kB
  • After compression 682.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 51.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (86%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whichairline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whichairline.com

whichairline.com

61 ms

497 ms

tailwind.travel.1dbcdfa3.css

tailwind.travel.1dbcdfa3.css

96 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

41 ms

kiwicom-logo.svg

kiwicom-logo.svg

121 ms

flag-gb.jpg

flag-gb.jpg

89 ms

desktop-bg@2x.png

desktop-bg@2x.png

201 ms

continents.5c9adfbd.js

continents.5c9adfbd.js

31 ms

intl.ce74b2e8.js

intl.ce74b2e8.js

74 ms

intl-icu.a69b94ba.js

intl-icu.a69b94ba.js

242 ms

language.8037708a.js

language.8037708a.js

186 ms

legacy-content-messages.34b83357.js

legacy-content-messages.34b83357.js

50 ms

kiwicom.8c773790.js

kiwicom.8c773790.js

186 ms

runtime.e9a2f8d9.js

runtime.e9a2f8d9.js

184 ms

npm.date-fns.locale-en-US.fabbb436.js

npm.date-fns.locale-en-US.fabbb436.js

187 ms

npm.date-fns.locale-_lib.c4c6b8dc.js

npm.date-fns.locale-_lib.c4c6b8dc.js

189 ms

npm.date-fns.93809027.js

npm.date-fns.93809027.js

188 ms

npm.ramda.1f382b75.js

npm.ramda.1f382b75.js

191 ms

npm.core-js.6a0e2a02.js

npm.core-js.6a0e2a02.js

191 ms

npm.sentry__core.8c797666.js

npm.sentry__core.8c797666.js

190 ms

npm.sentry__utils.a7f5b077.js

npm.sentry__utils.a7f5b077.js

195 ms

npm.sentry__browser.0813e205.js

npm.sentry__browser.0813e205.js

195 ms

npm.relay-runtime.9794227e.js

npm.relay-runtime.9794227e.js

205 ms

npm.react-relay.019ea9fd.js

npm.react-relay.019ea9fd.js

191 ms

npm.remix-run__router.77dd7eea.js

npm.remix-run__router.77dd7eea.js

192 ms

npm.react-dom.a75bfbab.js

npm.react-dom.a75bfbab.js

230 ms

npm.popperjs__core.d905f124.js

npm.popperjs__core.d905f124.js

225 ms

npm.graphql.bfe7ed63.js

npm.graphql.bfe7ed63.js

212 ms

9554.fef40d9f.js

9554.fef40d9f.js

304 ms

travel.a4b40e19.js

travel.a4b40e19.js

305 ms

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-index.45ec5b23.js

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-index.45ec5b23.js

231 ms

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-consts-events.1e059dc4.js

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-consts-events.1e059dc4.js

289 ms

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-components-screens-CreateAccount-index.19f29553.js

npm.kiwicom__nitro.lib-components-MagicLogin-components-screens-CreateAccount-index.19f29553.js

303 ms

9312.17ceaae6.js

9312.17ceaae6.js

287 ms

MagicLogin.5149fb96.js

MagicLogin.5149fb96.js

303 ms

7161.0f82d568.js

7161.0f82d568.js

288 ms

9355.c1750cac.js

9355.c1750cac.js

304 ms

AirlinesPage.71603503.js

AirlinesPage.71603503.js

345 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

111 ms

Accessibility Review

whichairline.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whichairline.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

whichairline.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whichairline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whichairline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whichairline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whichairline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: