Tools & Wizards About Us
whiteaster.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

whiteaster.com

IT Software, Web & Mobile App Development Company Poland | Whiteaster

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

584 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

whiteaster.com screenshot

About Website

Visit whiteaster.com now to see the best up-to-date Whiteaster content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whiteaster.com

We create apps that use machine learning and software based on artificial intelligence, develop Open Data portals and design easy-to-use applications. Find out more!

Visit whiteaster.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whiteaster.com page load time and found that the first response time was 584 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whiteaster.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whiteaster.com

584 ms

21bc7daac657694c6c4a23b04459caea.css

342 ms

jquery.min.js

350 ms

javascript;base64,d2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllcj13aW5kb3cuZGF0YUxheWVyfHxbXTtmdW5jdGlvbiBndGFnKCl7ZGF0YUxheWVyLnB1c2goYXJndW1lbnRzKX0KZ3RhZygnanMnLG5ldyBEYXRlKCkpO2d0YWcoJ2NvbmZpZycsJ1VBLTExNDc4MTA4NC0xJyk=

2 ms

instant_click.min.js

341 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Whiteaster.com, 5% (1 request) were made to and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Whiteaster.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

746.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whiteaster.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 714.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 65.2 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 202.3 kB

  • Original 714.9 kB
  • After minification 512.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whiteaster needs image optimization as it can save up to 202.3 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 196.9 kB
  • After minification 196.9 kB
  • After compression 177.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 50.1 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whiteaster.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whiteaster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whiteaster.com

whiteaster.com

584 ms

21bc7daac657694c6c4a23b04459caea.css

21bc7daac657694c6c4a23b04459caea.css

342 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

350 ms

javascript;base64,d2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllcj13aW5kb3cuZGF0YUxheWVyfHxbXTtmdW5jdGlvbiBndGFnKCl7ZGF0YUxheWVyLnB1c2goYXJndW1lbnRzKX0KZ3RhZygnanMnLG5ldyBEYXRlKCkpO2d0YWcoJ2NvbmZpZycsJ1VBLTExNDc4MTA4NC0xJyk=

javascript;base64,d2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllcj13aW5kb3cuZGF0YUxheWVyfHxbXTtmdW5jdGlvbiBndGFnKCl7ZGF0YUxheWVyLnB1c2goYXJndW1lbnRzKX0KZ3RhZygnanMnLG5ldyBEYXRlKCkpO2d0YWcoJ2NvbmZpZycsJ1VBLTExNDc4MTA4NC0xJyk=

2 ms

instant_click.min.js

instant_click.min.js

341 ms

5689302a053da7db2964c94bd8894347.js

5689302a053da7db2964c94bd8894347.js

684 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

115 ms

heroBG.png

heroBG.png

579 ms

kolor_biale.png

kolor_biale.png

116 ms

arrowLeft.png

arrowLeft.png

341 ms

arrowUp.png

arrowUp.png

460 ms

greyDots.svg

greyDots.svg

330 ms

newsletterBG@2x.png

newsletterBG@2x.png

403 ms

poppins-regular-webfont.woff

poppins-regular-webfont.woff

390 ms

poppins-medium-webfont.woff

poppins-medium-webfont.woff

411 ms

poppins-light-webfont.woff

poppins-light-webfont.woff

467 ms

poppins-bold-webfont.woff

poppins-bold-webfont.woff

500 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

527 ms

opensans-light-webfont.woff

opensans-light-webfont.woff

527 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

580 ms

5c2a2512a940c776f79ce2e28ef6404a.js

5c2a2512a940c776f79ce2e28ef6404a.js

231 ms

js

js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

whiteaster.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

whiteaster.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

whiteaster.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteaster.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whiteaster.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whiteaster.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whiteaster. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: