Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

whiteboxstorage.com

White Box Storage - Your Alternatives for Small Beginnings

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

4.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

whiteboxstorage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit whiteboxstorage.com now to see the best up-to-date White Box Storage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whiteboxstorage.com

Dedicated to helping you find storage alternatives for personal use, home offices, and small business projects. White Box Storage has easy guides for you to...

Visit whiteboxstorage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whiteboxstorage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whiteboxstorage.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whiteboxstorage.com

4068 ms

css

30 ms

1708702224index.css

15 ms

1708702223index.css

325 ms

1708702222index.css

322 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Whiteboxstorage.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Whiteboxstorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

344.0 kB

After Optimization

286.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Whiteboxstorage.com main page is 344.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 275.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 275.9 kB
  • After minification 267.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. White Box Storage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (24%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of White Box Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whiteboxstorage.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

whiteboxstorage.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whiteboxstorage.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteboxstorage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whiteboxstorage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of White Box Storage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: