3.3 sec in total
794 ms
2.1 sec
434 ms
Visit whitec.in now to see the best up-to-date Whitec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whitec.in
White Cells Inc - A Domain Names Registration, Website Hosting Services with affordable shared & reseller web hosting plans in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Visit whitec.inWe analyzed Whitec.in page load time and found that the first response time was 794 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
whitec.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
794 ms
60 ms
70 ms
139 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Whitec.in, 1% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) belongs to the original domain Whitec.in.
Page size can be reduced by 241.0 kB (44%)
547.7 kB
306.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Whitec.in main page is 547.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitec.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (60%)
70
28
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whitec.in
794 ms
reset.css
60 ms
style.css
70 ms
styles.css
139 ms
social_widget.css
150 ms
default.min.css
146 ms
shortcodes.css
64 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
231 ms
page_templates.css
117 ms
jquery.js
213 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
211 ms
et_shortcodes_frontend.js
304 ms
jquery.lavalamp.1.3.3-min.js
197 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
209 ms
superfish.js
345 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
345 ms
jquery.form.min.js
348 ms
scripts.js
347 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
300 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
363 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
366 ms
background.png
357 ms
ga.js
21 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
header_bg.png
102 ms
logo1.png
107 ms
separator.png
102 ms
search_btn.png
110 ms
searchbox.png
109 ms
menu_bg.png
124 ms
menu_line.png
151 ms
dropdown_top.png
390 ms
submenu_li.gif
401 ms
featured_before.png
396 ms
fleft_arrow.png
402 ms
featured_bg.png
403 ms
ajax-loader.gif
189 ms
Web-Design-19423_177x177.jpg
238 ms
web-hosting-6942_177x177.jpg
387 ms
domain001-123626_177x177.jpg
388 ms
ganpati-13920_177x177.jpg
404 ms
featured_menu_selected_bg.png
402 ms
Web-Design-19423_35x35.jpg
403 ms
featured_menuimgbg.gif
426 ms
featured_menubg.png
422 ms
web-hosting-6942_35x35.jpg
434 ms
domain001-123626_35x35.jpg
426 ms
ganpati-13920_35x35.jpg
424 ms
featured_aftr.png
424 ms
fright_arrow.png
453 ms
content-top.gif
450 ms
content_bg.png
442 ms
post_info_bg.png
461 ms
comments.png
459 ms
seop-19931_164x164.jpg
439 ms
button_blue_left.png
484 ms
printfriendly.js
60 ms
button_blue_right.png
442 ms
Web-Design-19423_164x164.jpg
443 ms
web-hosting-6942_164x164.jpg
413 ms
domain001-123626_164x164.jpg
426 ms
sidebar_block_h2.png
423 ms
sidebar_hr.png
423 ms
list_w.png
452 ms
content-bottom.gif
450 ms
footer_bg.png
483 ms
footer_text_bg.png
439 ms
lavalamp.png
414 ms
widget_v2.134.js
13 ms
button_grey_left.png
303 ms
button_grey_right.png
324 ms
whitec.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
whitec.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
whitec.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitec.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whitec.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whitec.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whitec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: