Tools & Wizards About Us
whitechapel.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

whitechapel.org.uk

Whitechapel Mission - homeless shelter in London, offering free food, showers, clothing and advice

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

whitechapel.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whitechapel content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whitechapel.org.uk

The Whitechapel Mission has been serving the homeless and marginalised for 146 years – including a day centre, skills training and career advice, activity programmes and specialist support for complex...

Visit whitechapel.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Whitechapel.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whitechapel.org.uk performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.365

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whitechapel.org.uk

38 ms

whitechapel.org.uk

1252 ms

bootstrap.min.css

45 ms

style.css

52 ms

archtera.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Whitechapel.org.uk, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Whitechapel.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whitechapel.org.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitechapel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 263.0 kB
  • After minification 263.0 kB
  • After compression 260.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 58 B

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 63.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitechapel.org.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (45%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitechapel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whitechapel.org.uk

whitechapel.org.uk

38 ms

whitechapel.org.uk

whitechapel.org.uk

1252 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

45 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

archtera.css

archtera.css

58 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

logo.png

logo.png

40 ms

service-ico-1.png

service-ico-1.png

307 ms

service-ico-2.png

service-ico-2.png

304 ms

service-ico-3.png

service-ico-3.png

319 ms

service-ico-4.png

service-ico-4.png

333 ms

service-ico-5.png

service-ico-5.png

308 ms

service-ico-6.png

service-ico-6.png

337 ms

vol.jpg

vol.jpg

320 ms

funds.jpg

funds.jpg

321 ms

goods.jpg

goods.jpg

327 ms

streetlink.png

streetlink.png

625 ms

animate.css

animate.css

303 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

304 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

307 ms

boxicons.css

boxicons.css

315 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

320 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

328 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

322 ms

place

place

270 ms

house-gold.svg

house-gold.svg

509 ms

shirt-gold.svg

shirt-gold.svg

508 ms

bowl-gold.svg

bowl-gold.svg

510 ms

logo-light.png

logo-light.png

574 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

499 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

512 ms

script.js

script.js

564 ms

metro-mail.svg

metro-mail.svg

563 ms

fundraising.png

fundraising.png

787 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

60 ms

js

js

32 ms

search.js

search.js

196 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

204 ms

main.js

main.js

258 ms

slider28.jpg

slider28.jpg

448 ms

slider26.jpg

slider26.jpg

511 ms

about-staff.jpg

about-staff.jpg

508 ms

serive-icon-bg.png

serive-icon-bg.png

511 ms

1-thump.jpg

1-thump.jpg

509 ms

2-thump.jpg

2-thump.jpg

566 ms

3-thump.jpg

3-thump.jpg

558 ms

4-thump.jpg

4-thump.jpg

759 ms

5-thump.jpg

5-thump.jpg

788 ms

6-thump.jpg

6-thump.jpg

779 ms

computer4-thump.jpg

computer4-thump.jpg

770 ms

8-thump.jpg

8-thump.jpg

578 ms

9-thump.jpg

9-thump.jpg

838 ms

11-thump.jpg

11-thump.jpg

843 ms

10-thump.jpg

10-thump.jpg

1027 ms

12-thump.jpg

12-thump.jpg

1050 ms

counter-bg.jpg

counter-bg.jpg

1054 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

72 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

112 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

146 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

176 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedA.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedA.woff

177 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEw.woff

177 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEw.woff

179 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEw.woff

177 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

1098 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1076 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

84 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

117 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

20 ms

77 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

whitechapel.org.uk accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

whitechapel.org.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

whitechapel.org.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitechapel.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Whitechapel.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whitechapel.org.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whitechapel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: