Tools & Wizards About Us
whitecoatwaste.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

whitecoatwaste.com

White Coat Waste Project – STOP Taxpayer-Funded Animal Experiments

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

249 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

whitecoatwaste.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to whitecoatwaste.com homepage info - get ready to check White Coat Waste best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about whitecoatwaste.com

For a very limited time, the Greenbaum Foundation will generously double every contribution up to $100,000. This is the best opportunity to maximize your gift’s impact for dogs, cats, primates and all...

Visit whitecoatwaste.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whitecoatwaste.com page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whitecoatwaste.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,950 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.whitecoatwaste.com

249 ms

ga.js

16 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css

192 ms

jquery-ui-spinner.css

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Whitecoatwaste.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (555 ms) belongs to the original domain Whitecoatwaste.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 547.7 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whitecoatwaste.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 857.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 857.4 kB
  • After minification 827.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. White Coat Waste images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 314.2 kB

  • Original 464.4 kB
  • After minification 454.0 kB
  • After compression 150.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 314.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 192.0 kB

  • Original 226.7 kB
  • After minification 207.7 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitecoatwaste.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 192.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (70%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of White Coat Waste. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.whitecoatwaste.com

www.whitecoatwaste.com

249 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css

192 ms

jquery-ui-spinner.css

jquery-ui-spinner.css

173 ms

calendar-jos.css

calendar-jos.css

161 ms

form_maker_frontend.css

form_maker_frontend.css

152 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

228 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

bootstrap-theme.css

208 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

302 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

244 ms

js

js

50 ms

if_gmap_front_end.js

if_gmap_front_end.js

246 ms

jelly.min.js

jelly.min.js

259 ms

file-upload.js

file-upload.js

279 ms

calendar.js

calendar.js

343 ms

calendar_function.js

calendar_function.js

342 ms

css

css

82 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

30 ms

loader.js

loader.js

27 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

341 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

353 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

360 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

377 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

403 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

405 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

402 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

391 ms

youtube-embed.js

youtube-embed.js

445 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

25 ms

beagle.png

beagle.png

555 ms

one.png

one.png

161 ms

one-dollar.png

one-dollar.png

161 ms

two.png

two.png

159 ms

two-dollars.png

two-dollars.png

161 ms

three.png

three.png

172 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

193 ms

video-image.png

video-image.png

473 ms

carbon.png

carbon.png

215 ms

wcw-footer-logo.png

wcw-footer-logo.png

278 ms

getAllAppDefault.esi

getAllAppDefault.esi

97 ms

getSegment.php

getSegment.php

154 ms

checkOAuth.esi

checkOAuth.esi

7 ms

t.dhj

t.dhj

8 ms

t.dhj

t.dhj

16 ms

cm

cm

37 ms

x35248

x35248

107 ms

s-3271.xgi

s-3271.xgi

20 ms

20 ms

hbpix

hbpix

31 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

7 ms

7 ms

pixel

pixel

19 ms

pixel

pixel

17 ms

2981

2981

22 ms

iubenda.js

iubenda.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

whitecoatwaste.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

whitecoatwaste.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whitecoatwaste.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitecoatwaste.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Whitecoatwaste.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whitecoatwaste.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of White Coat Waste. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: