Tools & Wizards About Us
whitelabelantivirus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

whitelabelantivirus.com

De beste Dating Websites - Whitelabelantivirus

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

whitelabelantivirus.com screenshot

About Website

Visit whitelabelantivirus.com now to see the best up-to-date Whitelabelantivirus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whitelabelantivirus.com

Ben jij op zoek naar betrouwbare online dating websites? Whitelabelantivirus heeft ze voor je! Wij selecteren dagelijks enkel de beste datingsites in onze Top3! Succes gegarandeerd

Visit whitelabelantivirus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whitelabelantivirus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whitelabelantivirus.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,120 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whitelabelantivirus.com

1548 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

313 ms

style.min.css

396 ms

menu-animation.min.css

226 ms

style.min.css

394 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Whitelabelantivirus.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Kooldesignprojects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Whitelabelantivirus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 786.4 kB (68%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

369.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whitelabelantivirus.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 548.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 115.0 kB

  • Original 134.0 kB
  • After minification 128.1 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 166.6 kB
  • After minification 164.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitelabelantivirus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 200.2 kB

  • Original 306.4 kB
  • After minification 298.1 kB
  • After compression 106.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 200.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 469.1 kB

  • Original 548.9 kB
  • After minification 533.7 kB
  • After compression 79.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitelabelantivirus.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 469.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (66%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitelabelantivirus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whitelabelantivirus.com

whitelabelantivirus.com

1548 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

313 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

396 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

226 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

394 ms

styles.css

styles.css

240 ms

contact-form-7.min.css

contact-form-7.min.css

241 ms

settings.css

settings.css

302 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

321 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

395 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

347 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

371 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

625 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

426 ms

global.css

global.css

429 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

449 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

546 ms

post-77.css

post-77.css

466 ms

post-88.css

post-88.css

502 ms

css

css

33 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

583 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

523 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

544 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

580 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

679 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

620 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

714 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

762 ms

css

css

14 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

534 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

625 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

626 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

718 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

791 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

776 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

784 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

790 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

921 ms

js

js

60 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

791 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

772 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

702 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

701 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

666 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01.png

jr-desk-index-2_01.png

893 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_36.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_36.png

834 ms

2.png

2.png

834 ms

3.png

3.png

833 ms

4.png

4.png

834 ms

5.png

5.png

834 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_03.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_03.png

134 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_10.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_10.jpg

133 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_03.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_03.jpg

134 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_05.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_05.jpg

207 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_07.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_07.jpg

207 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_25.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_25.jpg

207 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_23.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_23.jpg

206 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_17.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_17.jpg

206 ms

jr-desk-index-2a_20.jpg

jr-desk-index-2a_20.jpg

738 ms

bg.png

bg.png

739 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_40.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_40.png

739 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_50.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_50.png

738 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_44.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_44.png

738 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_47.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_47.png

738 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_55.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_55.png

1009 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

590 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

591 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

594 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

594 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

594 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

594 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

594 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

593 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

617 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

610 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

608 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

608 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

609 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

607 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

631 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1260 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

804 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1260 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

418 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

404 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

414 ms

frontend-msie.min.css

frontend-msie.min.css

417 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

collect

collect

470 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

83 ms

jr-desk-index-2_01_36.png

jr-desk-index-2_01_36.png

173 ms

Accessibility Review

whitelabelantivirus.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

whitelabelantivirus.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whitelabelantivirus.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitelabelantivirus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whitelabelantivirus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whitelabelantivirus.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whitelabelantivirus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: