Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

556 ms

whofix.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to whofix.net homepage info - get ready to check Whofix best content right away, or after learning these important things about whofix.net

Visit whofix.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Whofix.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whofix.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whofix.net

1908 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

162 ms

css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

158 ms

style.min.css

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Whofix.net, 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Whofix.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 138.6 kB (39%)

Content Size

352.5 kB

After Optimization

213.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Whofix.net main page is 352.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 167.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 167.8 kB
  • After minification 157.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whofix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 122.9 kB
  • After minification 122.9 kB
  • After compression 42.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 37.7 kB

  • Original 47.6 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whofix.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whofix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whofix.net accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

whofix.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

whofix.net SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whofix.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Whofix.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whofix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: