Access whosbag.com. 후즈백 여성가방쇼핑몰

whosbag.com screenshot

1

Performance

Renders faster than
19% of other websites
54

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 23% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
77

SEO

Google-friendlier than
36% of websites

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

15 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

whosbag.com screenshot

About Website

Visit whosbag.com now to see the best up-to-date Whosbag content for South Korea and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whosbag.com

여성가방 쇼핑몰 후즈백, 모터백, 백팩, 카드지갑, 크로스백, 에코백, 토트백, 숄더백, 보부상가방, 미니백, 데일리백, 여자가방, 가방쇼핑몰

Visit whosbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whosbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 17.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,520 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.073

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.5 s

0/100

10%

whosbag.com

1242 ms

common.css

788 ms

font-awesome.css

6 ms

import.css

735 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

1177 ms

Our browser made a total of 408 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (373 requests) were addressed to the original Whosbag.com, 4% (16 requests) were made to Whosbag.img1.kr and 1% (4 requests) were made to Web4.logcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Whosbag.com.

Content Size

11.4 MB

After Optimization

9.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Whosbag.com main page is 11.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 387.6 kB

Original 424.2 kB
After minification 347.2 kB
After compression 36.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 77.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 387.6 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

Original 10.2 MB
After minification 9.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whosbag needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 364.1 kB

Original 523.3 kB
After minification 462.2 kB
After compression 159.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 364.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 209.5 kB

Original 262.8 kB
After minification 212.6 kB
After compression 53.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whosbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Now

406

After Optimization

319

The browser has sent 406 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whosbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

KO
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

EUC-KR

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whosbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Whosbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is euc-kr. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

whosbag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whosbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: