4.7 sec in total
218 ms
2.3 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to whoscored.info homepage info - get ready to check Whoscored best content right away, or after learning these important things about whoscored.info
Our experts at whoscored know which factors are going to play an important role in determining the outcome of a match. Singup now and start getting the winning tips from our processional tipsters.
Visit whoscored.infoWe analyzed Whoscored.info page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
whoscored.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
218 ms
593 ms
27 ms
22 ms
309 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Whoscored.info, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Whoscored.info.
Page size can be reduced by 479.1 kB (15%)
3.3 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Whoscored.info main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 235.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.9 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 236.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whoscored images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whoscored.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (36%)
36
23
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whoscored. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whoscored.info
218 ms
www.whoscored.info
593 ms
bootstrap.css
27 ms
style.css
22 ms
jquery-2.1.3.min.js
309 ms
font-awesome.min.css
13 ms
gtm.js
107 ms
logo.png
33 ms
img-01.jpg
542 ms
dark-matter.png
195 ms
header-bg.jpg
59 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
280 ms
bootstrap.min.js
49 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
49 ms
owl.theme.min.css
226 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
51 ms
jquery.form.js
70 ms
mycustom.js
83 ms
firebase.js
616 ms
notification.js
84 ms
parnner.png
112 ms
Whoscored_Football_Livescore.jpg
143 ms
Football_Live_Results_Whoscored.jpg
143 ms
ftr_img_1.png
162 ms
ftr_img_2.png
165 ms
ftr_img_3.png
176 ms
ftr_img_4.png
174 ms
ftr_img_5.png
190 ms
ftr_img_6.png
190 ms
ftr_img_7.png
380 ms
ftr_img_8.png
203 ms
nowscore.gif
213 ms
document-04-128.png
229 ms
mailIcon.png
421 ms
bebasneue-webfont.woff
414 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
514 ms
oswald-bold-webfont.woff
675 ms
mid_banner.jpg
1099 ms
subtle-dark-vertical.png
585 ms
oswald-regular-webfont.woff
724 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
775 ms
collect
14 ms
js
104 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.ttf
654 ms
bebasneue-webfont.ttf
551 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf
502 ms
oswald-bold-webfont.ttf
437 ms
oswald-regular-webfont.ttf
458 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
529 ms
whoscored.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
whoscored.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the notification permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
whoscored.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoscored.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Whoscored.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whoscored.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whoscored. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: