Tools & Wizards About Us
whosoff.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

whosoff.co.uk

Staff Holiday Booking System | Annual Leave Tracker | WhosOff

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

370 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

whosoff.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whos Off content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whosoff.co.uk

WhosOff is the leading professional employee holiday tracker that allows you to manage your staff leave. Sign up today for your FREE trial.

Visit whosoff.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Whosoff.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whosoff.co.uk performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.whosoff.com

370 ms

normalize.min.css

158 ms

base.css

166 ms

content.css

169 ms

base.css

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Whosoff.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Whosoff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whosoff.co.uk main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 960.6 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whos Off needs image optimization as it can save up to 960.6 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 13.8 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whosoff.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (64%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whos Off. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.whosoff.com

www.whosoff.com

370 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

158 ms

base.css

base.css

166 ms

content.css

content.css

169 ms

base.css

base.css

168 ms

css

css

24 ms

logo.png

logo.png

542 ms

tv.png

tv.png

874 ms

awards.png

awards.png

686 ms

public-mobiles-appstore.jpg

public-mobiles-appstore.jpg

325 ms

public-mobiles-appworld.jpg

public-mobiles-appworld.jpg

363 ms

public-mobiles-androidmarketplace.jpg

public-mobiles-androidmarketplace.jpg

337 ms

mobile-apps.png

mobile-apps.png

935 ms

home-no-hidden-costs.png

home-no-hidden-costs.png

501 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

9 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

18 ms

base.js

base.js

375 ms

google-remarketing.js

google-remarketing.js

469 ms

slider.js

slider.js

515 ms

home-anim.js

home-anim.js

552 ms

scrollingWorldFlags.js

scrollingWorldFlags.js

567 ms

scrollingClientLogos.js

scrollingClientLogos.js

597 ms

bg.png

bg.png

1108 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

543 ms

mast-logo.png

mast-logo.png

569 ms

Freescpt-webfont.woff

Freescpt-webfont.woff

505 ms

google.js

google.js

369 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

42 ms

55 ms

caseStudies.ashx

caseStudies.ashx

567 ms

uk.gif

uk.gif

90 ms

de.gif

de.gif

96 ms

US.gif

US.gif

91 ms

AU.gif

AU.gif

101 ms

CA.gif

CA.gif

169 ms

SI.gif

SI.gif

169 ms

IE.gif

IE.gif

171 ms

BR.gif

BR.gif

192 ms

ES.gif

ES.gif

196 ms

AE.gif

AE.gif

252 ms

FR.gif

FR.gif

251 ms

DK.gif

DK.gif

253 ms

NL.gif

NL.gif

285 ms

NZ.gif

NZ.gif

287 ms

SG.gif

SG.gif

331 ms

NO.gif

NO.gif

332 ms

MX.gif

MX.gif

334 ms

CH.gif

CH.gif

382 ms

CN.gif

CN.gif

384 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

42 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

40 ms

iirsm-logo.jpg

iirsm-logo.jpg

83 ms

adlens-case-study.png

adlens-case-study.png

85 ms

ravensworth-logo.png

ravensworth-logo.png

181 ms

imperial-college-healthcare-charity-logo.jpg

imperial-college-healthcare-charity-logo.jpg

86 ms

print.css

print.css

83 ms

Accessibility Review

whosoff.co.uk accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whosoff.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

whosoff.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whosoff.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whosoff.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whosoff.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whos Off. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: