2.1 sec in total
80 ms
1.6 sec
455 ms
Visit whotheman.com now to see the best up-to-date Whotheman content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whotheman.com
We partnered with 800+ media brands to engage, convert & monetize their digital audiences. Check out our community engagement solutions!
Visit whotheman.comWe analyzed Whotheman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
whotheman.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value7,120 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.494
17/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
80 ms
30 ms
140 ms
150 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Whotheman.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Sumome-140a.kxcdn.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) relates to the external source Viafoura.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (47%)
4.3 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Whotheman.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whotheman needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 726.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 726.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whotheman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (49%)
78
40
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whotheman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
viafoura.com
80 ms
3144550186.js
30 ms
bootstrap.min.css
140 ms
style.css
150 ms
fixed.css
152 ms
jquery.js
214 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
viafoura-wordpress.js
153 ms
load.sumome.com
337 ms
css
87 ms
v2.js
162 ms
production.js
334 ms
oct.js
3 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
140 ms
header-logo.png
403 ms
home-banner.jpg
283 ms
hearst-logo.png
94 ms
france-24.png
93 ms
chicago-tribune.png
94 ms
rogers.png
92 ms
cbc.png
219 ms
toronto-star.png
219 ms
one-platform-icon.png
219 ms
discover.jpg
281 ms
discover-icon.png
279 ms
engage.jpg
431 ms
engage-icon.png
279 ms
grow.jpg
403 ms
grow-icon.png
401 ms
bell.png
401 ms
discovery-channel.png
398 ms
pga.png
433 ms
bauer.png
431 ms
voetbal.png
433 ms
the-isish-times.png
442 ms
support-icon.png
442 ms
latimes.png
493 ms
cbs.png
495 ms
gatehousemedia.png
494 ms
metro.png
495 ms
journalmediagroup.png
499 ms
startribune.png
498 ms
insights.png
560 ms
MachineWars-233x233.jpg
767 ms
PublishersAudienceDevelopment-233x233.jpg
706 ms
FacebookThumbsDownBlog-233x233.jpg
682 ms
footer-logo.png
573 ms
twitter-icon.png
704 ms
facebook-icon.png
719 ms
googleplus-icon.png
927 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
170 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
227 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
349 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
348 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
622 ms
youtube-icon.png
760 ms
vf.js
173 ms
prum.min.js
112 ms
adsct
324 ms
adsct
172 ms
126193.js
322 ms
analytics.js
113 ms
1d0bb747-0cad-4de0-bc67-4a8cafd04262
208 ms
a7a8398a-9c18-4bcb-8936-735744bb7900
203 ms
360 ms
collect
85 ms
viafoura.css
57 ms
131 ms
collect
130 ms
css
44 ms
ga-audiences
49 ms
en_us.js
12 ms
ga.js
15 ms
ingest
24 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
service.js
19 ms
service.js
10 ms
service.js
21 ms
service.js
18 ms
load
229 ms
sumome-scrollbox-popup.css
13 ms
css
19 ms
__ptq.gif
27 ms
__ptq.gif
3 ms
__ptq.gif
4 ms
beacon.gif
21 ms
whotheman.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whotheman.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
whotheman.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whotheman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whotheman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whotheman.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whotheman. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: