17.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
16.1 sec
104 ms
Click here to check amazing Whpipe content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whpipe.com
Your description here.
Visit whpipe.comWe analyzed Whpipe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 16.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
whpipe.com performance score
1129 ms
745 ms
500 ms
760 ms
502 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Whpipe.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to Bdimg.share.baidu.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Tjs.sjs.sinajs.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Rs.sinajs.cn.
Page size can be reduced by 325.8 kB (60%)
539.8 kB
214.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Whpipe.com main page is 539.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 383.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whpipe needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 204.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whpipe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (68%)
40
13
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whpipe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.whpipe.com
1129 ms
style.css
745 ms
css.css
500 ms
jquery.min.js
760 ms
slides.js
502 ms
jquery.qrcode.min.js
501 ms
echo.min.js
509 ms
script.js
757 ms
flexisel.js
780 ms
wb.js
509 ms
superfish.js
778 ms
gb2big5.js
799 ms
infinite-scroll.js
988 ms
logo.png
252 ms
loading.gif
251 ms
favicon.png
252 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
749 ms
stat.php
1139 ms
stat.htm
161 ms
core.php
965 ms
9.gif
2621 ms
pic1.gif
802 ms
share.js
694 ms
loading1.gif
555 ms
bundle.js
1375 ms
share_api.js
225 ms
share_view.js
447 ms
tangram.js
1701 ms
api_base.js
445 ms
view_base.js
225 ms
client.js
11 ms
iframeWidget.js
12 ms
aj_relationship.php
1894 ms
app.gif
1421 ms
share_style1_16.css
236 ms
followbutton.php
3380 ms
logger.js
225 ms
followButton.css
1934 ms
bg_flbtn.png
5 ms
sso.js
4 ms
followButton.js
11 ms
suda.js
18 ms
b.gif
4115 ms
whpipe.com SEO score
ZH
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whpipe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whpipe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whpipe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whpipe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: