2 sec in total
219 ms
1.7 sec
151 ms
Visit widgetpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Widgetpack content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about widgetpack.com
Widget Pack service will help your Website, Blog or Online Store to drive traffic and increase sales with social and free web widgets
Visit widgetpack.comWe analyzed Widgetpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
widgetpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
219 ms
406 ms
191 ms
281 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Widgetpack.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Embed.widgetpack.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (463 ms) belongs to the original domain Widgetpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 242.6 kB (40%)
609.8 kB
367.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Widgetpack.com main page is 609.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 388.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Widgetpack needs image optimization as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 151.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Widgetpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)
22
10
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Widgetpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
widgetpack.com
219 ms
widgetpack.com
406 ms
bootstrap.min.css
191 ms
slick.css
281 ms
slick-theme.css
279 ms
simple-line-icons.css
281 ms
main.css
284 ms
logo.png
387 ms
comment.png
391 ms
review.png
462 ms
jquery.min.js
463 ms
bootstrap.min.js
387 ms
slick.min.js
386 ms
main.js
396 ms
css
52 ms
widget.js
447 ms
google.png
457 ms
facebook-follow.png
230 ms
twitter-follow.png
229 ms
google-plus-follow.png
230 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
45 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
256 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
ajax-loader.gif
101 ms
slick.woff
94 ms
collect
10 ms
slick.ttf
95 ms
rating.js
190 ms
rating.css
283 ms
slick.svg
95 ms
widgetpack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
widgetpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
widgetpack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Widgetpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Widgetpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
widgetpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Widgetpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: