Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

11.7 sec in total

First Response

483 ms

Resources Loaded

10.8 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

wikipediareview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wikipediareview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wikipediareview.com

Visit wikipediareview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wikipediareview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wikipediareview.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wikipediareview.com

483 ms

forum64306_global.js

103 ms

board_menu.js

150 ms

board49346_menu_html.js

203 ms

forum35903_board.js

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wikipediareview.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Wikipediareview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.0 kB (78%)

Content Size

80.5 kB

After Optimization

17.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Wikipediareview.com main page is 80.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 63.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 63.3 kB
  • After minification 62.2 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 782 B
  • After minification 782 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wikipediareview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (57%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wikipediareview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wikipediareview.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

wikipediareview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

wikipediareview.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wikipediareview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wikipediareview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wikipediareview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: