Tools & Wizards About Us
wildcard.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

wildcard.in

Personalized Emails & URLs

Page Load Speed

787 ms in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

506 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

wildcard.in screenshot

About Website

Visit wildcard.in now to see the best up-to-date Wildcard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wildcard.in

Personalized Emails & URLs

Visit wildcard.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Wildcard.in page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 506 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wildcard.in performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wildcard.in

281 ms

wildcard.in

223 ms

142 ms

v0.js

53 ms

amp-consent-0.1.js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wildcard.in, 33% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 22% (2 requests) were made to Jupiterin.swipepages.media. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (281 ms) belongs to the original domain Wildcard.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 614 B (0%)

Content Size

144.0 kB

After Optimization

143.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wildcard.in main page is 144.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 143.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 388 B

  • Original 766 B
  • After minification 766 B
  • After compression 378 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 388 B or 51% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 226 B

  • Original 143.3 kB
  • After minification 143.3 kB
  • After compression 143.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wildcard. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

wildcard.in

wildcard.in

281 ms

wildcard.in

wildcard.in

223 ms

142 ms

v0.js

v0.js

53 ms

amp-consent-0.1.js

amp-consent-0.1.js

66 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

69 ms

css

css

40 ms

pattern-four.svg

pattern-four.svg

39 ms

patterns-2.svg

patterns-2.svg

39 ms

Accessibility Review

wildcard.in accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

wildcard.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wildcard.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Wildcard.in main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

wildcard.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wildcard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: