Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

Page Load Speed

794 ms in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

542 ms

Page Rendered

124 ms

wilddiet.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wilddiet content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wilddiet.org

Visit wilddiet.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Wilddiet.org page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 666 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wilddiet.org performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wilddiet.org

128 ms

www.wilddiet.org

119 ms

dashboard

124 ms

new

40 ms

template.css

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Wilddiet.org, 10% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Js-agent.newrelic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (128 ms) belongs to the original domain Wilddiet.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.5 kB (38%)

Content Size

114.1 kB

After Optimization

70.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Wilddiet.org main page is 114.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 62% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wilddiet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.9 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wilddiet.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wilddiet. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

wilddiet.org accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wilddiet.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wilddiet.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wilddiet.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Wilddiet.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wilddiet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: