Tools & Wizards About Us
wildlifedepartment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

wildlifedepartment.com

Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation | Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

253 ms

wildlifedepartment.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wildlife Department content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wildlifedepartment.com

Homepage for the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation. Purchase your hunting or fishing license. Explore Outdoor Oklahoma and more.

Visit wildlifedepartment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wildlifedepartment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wildlifedepartment.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,510 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wildlifedepartment.com

222 ms

styletest.css

80 ms

videolightbox.css

87 ms

overlay-minimal.css

88 ms

superfish.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Wildlifedepartment.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Wildlifedepartment.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 844.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wildlifedepartment.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 23.9 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 275.7 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wildlife Department needs image optimization as it can save up to 275.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 318.5 kB

  • Original 514.5 kB
  • After minification 485.7 kB
  • After compression 196.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 221.9 kB

  • Original 269.0 kB
  • After minification 263.0 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wildlifedepartment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (65%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wildlife Department. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wildlifedepartment.com

wildlifedepartment.com

222 ms

styletest.css

styletest.css

80 ms

videolightbox.css

videolightbox.css

87 ms

overlay-minimal.css

overlay-minimal.css

88 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

90 ms

jquery-1.2.6.min.js

jquery-1.2.6.min.js

216 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

88 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

161 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

126 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

126 ms

videolightbox.js

videolightbox.js

129 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

128 ms

default.css

default.css

166 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

167 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

167 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

169 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

200 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

51 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

206 ms

jquery.colorbox.js

jquery.colorbox.js

207 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

208 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

208 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

258 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

258 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

259 ms

mainmenu.js

mainmenu.js

239 ms

ga.js

ga.js

58 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

87 ms

header.png

header.png

112 ms

feature_bg.gif

feature_bg.gif

57 ms

trout_picture_for_website.png

trout_picture_for_website.png

351 ms

newhuntingviewer.jpg

newhuntingviewer.jpg

352 ms

outoksubscribe.jpg

outoksubscribe.jpg

181 ms

spotlight_trout_stocking.jpg

spotlight_trout_stocking.jpg

111 ms

conservationplate.png

conservationplate.png

131 ms

gwlisting.png

gwlisting.png

205 ms

donate.png

donate.png

523 ms

facebookIcon.png

facebookIcon.png

174 ms

twitterIcon.png

twitterIcon.png

223 ms

youtubeicon.png

youtubeicon.png

224 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

231 ms

headline_button_bg.gif

headline_button_bg.gif

245 ms

news_bg.png

news_bg.png

246 ms

arrow_bullet_green.png

arrow_bullet_green.png

278 ms

spotlight_bg.png

spotlight_bg.png

286 ms

nav_bg.png

nav_bg.png

258 ms

white.png

white.png

299 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

videoseries

videoseries

126 ms

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css

109 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

131 ms

base.js

base.js

229 ms

1eJU4PjErWSV5LNTKFXcze5UHikZLg3viIH581vcHWA.js

1eJU4PjErWSV5LNTKFXcze5UHikZLg3viIH581vcHWA.js

57 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

47 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

83 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

91 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

43 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

44 ms

Accessibility Review

wildlifedepartment.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wildlifedepartment.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wildlifedepartment.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wildlifedepartment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wildlifedepartment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wildlifedepartment.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wildlife Department. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: