Access williamcblake.com. Technical Industrial Copywriter | Persuasive, Technically Precise Copy

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

williamcblake.com

357 ms

thrColElsHdr.css

360 ms

speedglas_awkward_index.jpg

423 ms

in.js

22 ms

refinery_at_night_5_crop_reducedflare.jpg

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Williamcblake.com, 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (423 ms) belongs to the original domain Williamcblake.com.

Content Size

136.7 kB

After Optimization

120.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Williamcblake.com main page is 136.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 98.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

Original 11.8 kB
After minification 10.8 kB
After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 191 B

Original 98.8 kB
After minification 98.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. William C Blake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

Original 17.2 kB
After minification 17.2 kB
After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

Original 9.0 kB
After minification 3.5 kB
After compression 824 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Williamcblake.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of William C Blake. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.