Tools & Wizards About Us
williams-cgi.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

williams-cgi.co.uk

Williams CGI - Norfolk CGI - Premium Architectural & Product Visualisation

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

162 ms

williams-cgi.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to williams-cgi.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Williams CGI best content right away, or after learning these important things about williams-cgi.co.uk

At Norfolk based Williams CGI we pride ourselves on creating premium imagery for architecture/product design; giving our clients the edge in visual quality.

Visit williams-cgi.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Williams-cgi.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

williams-cgi.co.uk performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value43.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

williams-cgi.co.uk

2037 ms

style.min.css

530 ms

leaflet.css

374 ms

mappress.css

380 ms

style.build.css

374 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Williams-cgi.co.uk, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Williams-cgi.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (25%)

Content Size

11.4 MB

After Optimization

8.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Williams-cgi.co.uk main page is 11.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 126.9 kB

  • Original 156.0 kB
  • After minification 154.4 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 9.7 MB
  • After minification 8.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Williams CGI needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 450.3 kB

  • Original 827.2 kB
  • After minification 826.4 kB
  • After compression 376.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.3 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 598.1 kB

  • Original 729.3 kB
  • After minification 621.0 kB
  • After compression 131.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Williams-cgi.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 598.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (78%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Williams CGI. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

williams-cgi.co.uk

williams-cgi.co.uk

2037 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

530 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

374 ms

mappress.css

mappress.css

380 ms

style.build.css

style.build.css

374 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

291 ms

styles.css

styles.css

353 ms

essential-widgets-public.css

essential-widgets-public.css

389 ms

menu-image.css

menu-image.css

463 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

556 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

464 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

469 ms

deprecated-style.min.css

deprecated-style.min.css

480 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

536 ms

css

css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

823 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

557 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

477 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

576 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

477 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

577 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

489 ms

essential-widgets-public.js

essential-widgets-public.js

490 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

571 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

789 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

590 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

589 ms

index.js

index.js

701 ms

index.js

index.js

701 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

702 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

702 ms

api.js

api.js

43 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

704 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

705 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

783 ms

index.js

index.js

709 ms

sp-scripts.min.js

sp-scripts.min.js

708 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

946 ms

WILLIAMS_CGI_Logo_Full_CMYK_Colour.png

WILLIAMS_CGI_Logo_Full_CMYK_Colour.png

422 ms

bayfield_homes_suffolk_01.jpg

bayfield_homes_suffolk_01.jpg

597 ms

bayfield_homes_suffolk_02.jpg

bayfield_homes_suffolk_02.jpg

691 ms

private_property_north_norfolk_front_cover.jpg

private_property_north_norfolk_front_cover.jpg

451 ms

automotive_showroom_norfolk-1.jpg

automotive_showroom_norfolk-1.jpg

703 ms

nps_office_01-scaled.jpg

nps_office_01-scaled.jpg

588 ms

hurricane_cockpit.jpg

hurricane_cockpit.jpg

613 ms

tank_mkiv_01.jpg

tank_mkiv_01.jpg

635 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLbOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLbOWA.ttf

46 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8cTfOLbOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8cTfOLbOWA.ttf

66 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8ajfOLbOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8ajfOLbOWA.ttf

98 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8SjYOLbOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8SjYOLbOWA.ttf

95 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLbOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLbOWA.ttf

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

611 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

624 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

64 ms

Accessibility Review

williams-cgi.co.uk accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

williams-cgi.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

williams-cgi.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Williams-cgi.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Williams-cgi.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

williams-cgi.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Williams CGI. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: