Tools & Wizards About Us
williamsortho.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

williamsortho.net

Welcome to Williams Orthodontics | Grand Rapids Orthodontist

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

786 ms

Page Rendered

429 ms

williamsortho.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Williams Ortho content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about williamsortho.net

Located near Grand Rapids (MI), orthodontist Dr. Williams has been providing Invisalign, Damon, and other orthodontic braces and retainers for years.

Visit williamsortho.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Williamsortho.net page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

williamsortho.net performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

williamsortho.net

76 ms

www.williamsortho.net

55 ms

style.min.css

14 ms

styles.css

50 ms

settings.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Williamsortho.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (317 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 877.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Williamsortho.net main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 198.9 kB

  • Original 235.8 kB
  • After minification 232.7 kB
  • After compression 36.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 617.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Williams Ortho needs image optimization as it can save up to 617.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 341.1 kB
  • After minification 341.1 kB
  • After compression 303.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 104.3 kB
  • After minification 104.3 kB
  • After compression 80.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Williamsortho.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (53%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Williams Ortho. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

williamsortho.net

williamsortho.net

76 ms

www.williamsortho.net

www.williamsortho.net

55 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

14 ms

styles.css

styles.css

50 ms

settings.css

settings.css

23 ms

css

css

75 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

50 ms

ilightbox.css

ilightbox.css

53 ms

animations.css

animations.css

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

60 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

59 ms

custom.js

custom.js

58 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

61 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

64 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

59 ms

index.js

index.js

57 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

62 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

297 ms

Google-Maps-3.png

Google-Maps-3.png

221 ms

WO-logo-horizontal.png

WO-logo-horizontal.png

217 ms

IMG_0192x-1024x683.jpg

IMG_0192x-1024x683.jpg

256 ms

Front-Desk.jpg

Front-Desk.jpg

255 ms

WO-Staff-Front-Slider.jpg

WO-Staff-Front-Slider.jpg

259 ms

IMG_60221.jpg

IMG_60221.jpg

217 ms

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-10.12.37-AM.png

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-10.12.37-AM.png

257 ms

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-8.47.23-AM3.png

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-8.47.23-AM3.png

291 ms

IMG_0328-4.jpg

IMG_0328-4.jpg

257 ms

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-8.47.23-AM2.png

Screen-Shot-2015-08-20-at-8.47.23-AM2.png

290 ms

EYqxmaNOzLlWtsZSScy6XTNscZGf2w.ttf

EYqxmaNOzLlWtsZSScy6XTNscZGf2w.ttf

317 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

259 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

131 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

107 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

210 ms

collect

collect

66 ms

js

js

87 ms

Accessibility Review

williamsortho.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

williamsortho.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

williamsortho.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Williamsortho.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Williamsortho.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

williamsortho.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Williams Ortho. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: