7.5 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.4 sec
408 ms
Click here to check amazing Wilrock content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wilrock.com
Wilrock Ltd is the solution to your concrete and aggregate needs . St.Lucia's #1 producer of blocks, concrete and exporter of aggregate.
Visit wilrock.comWe analyzed Wilrock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
wilrock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value20.8 s
0/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
2739 ms
37 ms
71 ms
87 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Wilrock.com, 50% (31 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Wilrock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 458.0 kB (2%)
26.8 MB
26.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Wilrock.com main page is 26.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 371.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wilrock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wilrock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (48%)
29
15
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wilrock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wilrock.com
2739 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
style.min.css
71 ms
public.css
87 ms
css
17 ms
style.css
139 ms
css
31 ms
dashicons.min.css
95 ms
jquery.js
92 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
et-core-unified-17080133612909.min.css
105 ms
public.js
119 ms
custom.min.js
311 ms
common.js
311 ms
wp-embed.min.js
120 ms
analytics.js
249 ms
Wilrocklogo.jpg
366 ms
slider-1.jpg
862 ms
20161208_092850.jpg
1035 ms
slider-3.jpg
329 ms
20-mm-Aggregate-1.jpg
846 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-3.jpg
739 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-1-2.jpg
1382 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-2-1.jpg
907 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-1.jpg
1013 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-1-1.jpg
907 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-2.jpg
1120 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage.png
944 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
226 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
226 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
229 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
230 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
229 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
230 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
229 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
230 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
231 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
231 ms
modules.ttf
745 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYA.ttf
44 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
40 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
47 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYA.ttf
42 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYA.ttf
47 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
41 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
42 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
47 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
49 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
43 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
50 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
43 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
46 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
70 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
48 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
49 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
50 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
51 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
102 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
67 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
51 ms
collect
39 ms
js
80 ms
wilrock.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wilrock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wilrock.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wilrock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wilrock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wilrock.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wilrock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: