Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

windermerewatch.com

America's Most Unethical Real Estate Company

Page Load Speed

37.1 sec in total

First Response

675 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

32.8 sec

windermerewatch.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to windermerewatch.com homepage info - get ready to check Windermerewatch best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about windermerewatch.com

Case histories prove that consumers risk financial ruin and the actual loss of their home by choosing Windermere Real Estate to buy or sell their property.

Visit windermerewatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windermerewatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 675 ms and then it took 36.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windermerewatch.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

windermerewatch.com

675 ms

3col_leftNav.css

153 ms

Media%20Queries%20File%20WW2.css

179 ms

Larger%20WW%20logo.jpg

291 ms

WinWatchUpdtSlug2.jpg

272 ms

Our browser made a total of 168 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (166 requests) were addressed to the original Windermerewatch.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com and 1% (1 request) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) belongs to the original domain Windermerewatch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (34%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Windermerewatch.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 450.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 708.6 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Windermerewatch needs image optimization as it can save up to 708.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 961 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windermerewatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (2%)

Requests Now

167

After Optimization

163

The browser has sent 167 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windermerewatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

windermerewatch.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windermerewatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Windermerewatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Windermerewatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: