Tools & Wizards About Us
windowrepairsystems.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

windowrepairsystems.com

Window Repair Systems - Commercial Window Repair for Schools

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

927 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

windowrepairsystems.com screenshot

About Website

Visit windowrepairsystems.com now to see the best up-to-date Window Repair Systems content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about windowrepairsystems.com

Commercial Window Repair Specialists: Certified Window Balance Experts with technicians and leading window parts supplier.

Visit windowrepairsystems.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windowrepairsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 927 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windowrepairsystems.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

windowrepairsystems.com

927 ms

ga.js

14 ms

xm_extra_style.css

118 ms

1.0594324df6468746bba7eae1cdf01a77.css

350 ms

1.0221a8a46110a501e45547ba88f8951c.js

483 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Windowrepairsystems.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Tracking.websitealive.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Windowrepairsystems.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (59%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

859.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Windowrepairsystems.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 99.9 kB

  • Original 128.1 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB
  • After compression 28.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 437.1 kB
  • After minification 411.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Window Repair Systems images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 865.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 378.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 865.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 243.4 kB

  • Original 284.6 kB
  • After minification 218.9 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowrepairsystems.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (57%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Window Repair Systems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

windowrepairsystems.com

windowrepairsystems.com

927 ms

ga.js

ga.js

14 ms

xm_extra_style.css

xm_extra_style.css

118 ms

1.0594324df6468746bba7eae1cdf01a77.css

1.0594324df6468746bba7eae1cdf01a77.css

350 ms

1.0221a8a46110a501e45547ba88f8951c.js

1.0221a8a46110a501e45547ba88f8951c.js

483 ms

common.css

common.css

139 ms

font.css

font.css

130 ms

layout_2col_right.css

layout_2col_right.css

131 ms

royal.css

royal.css

152 ms

overrides.css

overrides.css

231 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.css

jquery.jscrollpane.css

156 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.lozenge.css

jquery.jscrollpane.lozenge.css

193 ms

jquery.watermark.min.js

jquery.watermark.min.js

209 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

227 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.min.js

jquery.jscrollpane.min.js

210 ms

image.min.js

image.min.js

256 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

257 ms

jquery.paginate.js

jquery.paginate.js

282 ms

jquery.jqzoom-core.js

jquery.jqzoom-core.js

266 ms

orangebox.min.js

orangebox.min.js

378 ms

custom.js

custom.js

380 ms

switch_layout.js

switch_layout.js

320 ms

jquery.featureList-1.0.0.js

jquery.featureList-1.0.0.js

324 ms

featured.css

featured.css

323 ms

jquery.social.js

jquery.social.js

359 ms

jquery.tipsy.min.js

jquery.tipsy.min.js

384 ms

social.css

social.css

397 ms

smart_dynamic_search.css

smart_dynamic_search.css

405 ms

smart_dynamic_search.js

smart_dynamic_search.js

425 ms

2.2daad7882f4161a1958a02e43598cbcf.js

2.2daad7882f4161a1958a02e43598cbcf.js

146 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

func.js

func.js

412 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

15 ms

3.f3c650a19a3a95bb7aa61796bbf67265.js

3.f3c650a19a3a95bb7aa61796bbf67265.js

263 ms

2.8e8e28457b4ef9bb441a3f7fcc0dac4b.css

2.8e8e28457b4ef9bb441a3f7fcc0dac4b.css

298 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

x.png

x.png

57 ms

dingbats_orders.gif

dingbats_orders.gif

66 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

88 ms

nav_sep_light.png

nav_sep_light.png

96 ms

sidebox-header.png

sidebox-header.png

70 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

69 ms

logo.png

logo.png

93 ms

tabs-bg.png

tabs-bg.png

227 ms

search_button.png

search_button.png

231 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

252 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

378 ms

center-header.png

center-header.png

232 ms

Facebooklogopic.png

Facebooklogopic.png

1196 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

250 ms

banner-2.jpg

banner-2.jpg

255 ms

banner-3.jpg

banner-3.jpg

84 ms

payment.png

payment.png

229 ms

xctmpvNTA8x.png

xctmpvNTA8x.png

1593 ms

xctmpH0Wyy3.png

xctmpH0Wyy3.png

247 ms

t-153847.png

t-153847.png

252 ms

xctmpVZJrxn.png

xctmpVZJrxn.png

224 ms

t-157922.png

t-157922.png

245 ms

xctmp1V5qZq.png

xctmp1V5qZq.png

481 ms

xctmpgwuHsO.png

xctmpgwuHsO.png

482 ms

xctmpxi1XuF.png

xctmpxi1XuF.png

389 ms

xctmpiKjJvV.png

xctmpiKjJvV.png

388 ms

xctmpS6pJxm.png

xctmpS6pJxm.png

387 ms

xctmpQn9ztA.png

xctmpQn9ztA.png

485 ms

xctmpPoAjYN.png

xctmpPoAjYN.png

480 ms

xctmpOoiQib.png

xctmpOoiQib.png

479 ms

helveticaneueltstd-roman-webfont.woff

helveticaneueltstd-roman-webfont.woff

198 ms

serpentine-medium-webfont.woff

serpentine-medium-webfont.woff

354 ms

helveticaneueltstd-hvcno-webfont.woff

helveticaneueltstd-hvcno-webfont.woff

353 ms

helveticaneueltstd-bdcn-webfont.woff

helveticaneueltstd-bdcn-webfont.woff

354 ms

helveticaneue-condensed-webfont.woff

helveticaneue-condensed-webfont.woff

348 ms

plus_minus.gif

plus_minus.gif

443 ms

294 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

115 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

99 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

269 ms

1295 ms

window-hardware-catalog-request.png

window-hardware-catalog-request.png

936 ms

111 ms

vTracker_v2.asp

vTracker_v2.asp

71 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

29 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

56 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

40 ms

vTracker_JS.asp

vTracker_JS.asp

8 ms

vTrackerSrc_v2.asp

vTrackerSrc_v2.asp

29 ms

V6CYD2B3MFHYZC3JZM73CL.js

V6CYD2B3MFHYZC3JZM73CL.js

172 ms

dragdiv.css

dragdiv.css

3 ms

tab_br_chat1.png

tab_br_chat1.png

55 ms

icon_close_bw.png

icon_close_bw.png

8 ms

dummy.htm

dummy.htm

9 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

2 ms

Accessibility Review

windowrepairsystems.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

windowrepairsystems.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

windowrepairsystems.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowrepairsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windowrepairsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

windowrepairsystems.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Window Repair Systems. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: