6.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.5 sec
1.1 sec
Visit windowsnorfolk.com now to see the best up-to-date Windows Norfolk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about windowsnorfolk.com
Windows Norfolk | Polytrade install quality Windows & Doors in Norfolk. Call 01379 854445 for a free no pressure window quote or survey.
Visit windowsnorfolk.comWe analyzed Windowsnorfolk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
windowsnorfolk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
1052 ms
136 ms
212 ms
251 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Windowsnorfolk.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Windowsnorfolk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 321.6 kB (10%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Windowsnorfolk.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Windows Norfolk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowsnorfolk.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (51%)
71
35
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windows Norfolk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
windowsnorfolk.com
1052 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
136 ms
wp-customer-reviews-generated.css
212 ms
all.min.css
251 ms
swipebox.css
265 ms
hover-pack.css
278 ms
img-gallery.css
281 ms
style.min.css
283 ms
styles.css
299 ms
style.css
345 ms
bootstrap.min.css
458 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
393 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
388 ms
animations.css
394 ms
main.css
409 ms
dodgerblue.css
440 ms
jquery.js
582 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
487 ms
hover-pack.js
489 ms
jquery.swipebox.js
514 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
529 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
548 ms
bootstrap.min.js
582 ms
bootstrap-wp.js
583 ms
smoothscroll.js
616 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
627 ms
jquery.appear.js
643 ms
jquery.velocity.js
772 ms
appear.config.js
675 ms
main.js
676 ms
enable-sticky-header.js
706 ms
scripts.js
718 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
734 ms
wp-embed.min.js
766 ms
owl.carousel.thumbs.js
770 ms
css
89 ms
css
98 ms
bootstrap-wp.css
395 ms
font-awesome.css
414 ms
Polytrade-300x144.jpg
515 ms
Polytrade.jpg
357 ms
slide2.jpg
557 ms
slide.jpg
477 ms
welcome-1.jpg
350 ms
0000373.jpg
478 ms
Unknown-84.jpeg
594 ms
Untitled-8l.jpg
354 ms
new-logo.jpg
404 ms
James-Hardie.jpg
404 ms
ULTION-LOGO-300x83.png
496 ms
everbuild-logo.jpg
495 ms
logo.jpg
668 ms
logo-1.jpg
591 ms
ARBO.jpg
595 ms
logo-main.png
699 ms
unibond.jpg
667 ms
fab-fix-300x152.jpg
668 ms
SQ-Rehau-Logo-150x150.jpg
657 ms
SQ-ALUK-Logo-150x150.jpg
681 ms
yale-300x293.png
732 ms
SQ-DoorCo-Logo-150x150.jpg
744 ms
SQ-Residence-Logo-150x150.jpg
748 ms
Solidor-150x150.jpg
756 ms
BMlogo.jpg
765 ms
securebydesign_logo-300x201.jpg
764 ms
new-ct1-logo-800x600-bb.jpg
1017 ms
brett-martin-cascade-1l.jpg
837 ms
97358170808125492.jpg
843 ms
Polytrade-1.jpg
844 ms
menu-border.png
527 ms
footer-bg.png
528 ms
scroll-top.png
586 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
572 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
52 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
48 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
49 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
52 ms
windowsnorfolk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
windowsnorfolk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
windowsnorfolk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowsnorfolk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windowsnorfolk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
windowsnorfolk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Windows Norfolk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: